New York – NYC’s Aging Bus Terminal To Get Patchwork Fixes

    6

    The 64-year-old Port Authority bus terminal, seen in a Friiday, July 25, 2014 photo and used by both commuters from New Jersey and travelers from the rest of the country, has received millions in funding for new repairs, in New York.  (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)New York – At the nation’s busiest bus station, winding lines of riders wait amid cracked floors, crumbling ceiling tiles and a wheezing air-conditioning system helped along by old-fashioned floor fans.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Dark corridors of Manhattan’s aging Port Authority Bus Terminal are populated by homeless men and women, and the sweet smell of warm pretzels from rows of food stalls mixes with an occasional whiff of urine.

    After a recent test ride from the New Jersey suburbs, the Port Authority’s new chairman, John Degnan, offered a one-word review: “Unacceptable.”

    While public attention and money is finally turning to improving LaGuardia Airport and the Penn Station rail hub — two other rundown, overcrowded New York transportation centers — the 64-year-old bus terminal has lurked under the radar for decades, seemingly stuck in a sad time warp.

    A statue out front of a grinning Ralph Kramden, Jackie Gleason’s bus driver character in “The Honeymooners” sitcom from the 1950s, only serves to underscore the impression.

    “It’s the neglected stepchild of New York’s transportation system, allowed to decline for decades,” says Mitchell Moss, a New York University professor of urban policy and planning.

    Port Authority commissioners have acknowledged for years that the terminal needs to be replaced, but that project — estimated to cost at least $1 billion — could be as far as a decade away for the behemoth agency that already faces financial and political woes.

    Until then, commissioners this past week approved an extra $90 million for an improvement plan that will include fixes to floors and ceilings, better cellphone service, cleaner restrooms and more street-level bus gates — a patchwork that Port Authority Vice Chairman Scott Rechler acknowledged is “sort of like putting lipstick on a pig.”

    The terminal, which has run an annual deficit of about $100 million in recent years, is on a long list of priorities for the Port Authority, which has funneled billions of dollars in recent years to fund other structurally deficient bridges and tunnels and the decimated World Trade Center site. The bus terminal wasn’t included on a list of major projects in the agency’s 10-year, $28 billion capital plan released this year, though the plan includes $173 million for various improvements.

    At the same time, the Port Authority is dealing with multiple investigations, including one into allegations that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and authority commissioners diverted $1.8 billion in agency money to non-agency projects. Christie and the other officials deny the accusations.

    Those pressures could mean more of the same for the 220,000 daily bus riders — both commuters from New Jersey and travelers from elsewhere — who use the terminal filled with stores and food outlets that covers two midtown Manhattan blocks from 40th to 42nd streets near Times Square.

    Among riders’ biggest complaints are service delays caused by a shortage of gates. Each afternoon, overflow buses that don’t fit into the terminal idle on surrounding avenues as far as six blocks away.
    A man sleeps in a passageway at the Port Authority Bus Terminal, Wednesday July 23, 2014 in New York.  The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey approved $90 million for urgent repairs at the 64-year-old complex used by both commuters from New Jersey and travelers from the rest of the country.  (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)
    Manhattan accountant David Perez often waits 30 minutes to get aboard a bus for his 10-minute ride home across the Hudson River to Weehawken, New Jersey.

    At Perez’s Gate 212, the escalator was stopped — not because it wasn’t working but because, with a crowd of hundreds pressing in elbow to elbow, it could be dangerous for them to squeeze onto moving stairs.

    “They need more space. They need to expand this facility,” he says.

    Janna Chernetz of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, a rider advocacy group, said the latest improvements may help with commuter comforts but they don’t address the primary problem — a terminal stretched to its operating capacity.

    “What is needed is a new garage and that has been needed for years,” she said.

    Hospital worker Israel Ramos, who gets to his bus via subway, says he stands in a line that winds through the building, some days including as many as 1,000 people.

    Even though he has to wait in a stuffy hallway with poor air conditioning, he keeps it all in perspective.

    “Actually, coming from the really hot subway platform, it doesn’t feel that bad here,” he says.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    6 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Sociologist
    Sociologist
    9 years ago

    One word can sum it up … implode.

    ayoyo
    ayoyo
    9 years ago

    The Port Authority wasted billions on the W.T.S. .That building wasn’t necessary at all. the bridges and roads are rusting away faster than they can be repaired .Our subway system is over 100 years old and failing Any city in the civilized world has better mass transportation than new york city .We keep on electing the same types of politicians as always . It is time to get new people and have the whole corrupt system dumped.

    Yoshi35
    Yoshi35
    9 years ago

    Without the Port Authority bus terminal (and connected parking garage) the traffic in NYC would not move at all during the waking hours of the day.

    blubluh
    blubluh
    9 years ago

    Even if money was no object, the logistics of replacing that facility are mind-boggling. It’s ideally situated for train and bus traffic and it’s right by a major thoroughfare. Where could they possibly put all that – not to mention the small private businesses that operate there – while the old facility is demolished and a new one is built in its place? That could easily turn into a four-year project!

    Even if they split the functions between a dozen or so smaller locations – assuming they could find usable locations – it’d still be a nightmare.

    The expression “too big to fail” certainly comes to mind!