Tel Aviv – Court Upholds State’s Plea Deal With Rabbi Pinto

    1

    In this Monday, July 11, 2011 photo, a man kisses the hand of Rabbi Yoshiyahu Pinto, center, as he attends a wedding in Lod, central Israel. (AP Photo/Oded Balilty) Tel Aviv – The High Court of Justice on Wednesday struck down a petition by anti-corruption watchdogs who demanded the nullification of a plea bargain struck between the state and a prominent rabbi accused of bribing a top police official.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Rabbi Yoshiyahu Yosef Pinto was indicted in September as part of a deal with the state in which he agreed to testify against the former commander of the Lahav 433 investigative division, Menashe Arbiv.

    Associates of Pinto allegedly gave Arbiv a series of bribes including a discounted apartment in Tel Aviv for his son, assistance in attaining US visas for his immediate family and free nights in a Manhattan hotel.

    Arbiv, who was essentially the former head of the “Israeli FBI,” resigned from his post on February 9 over the scandal, though he continues to claim his innocence and charges that Pinto is corrupt and manipulating the state.

    In exchange for Pinto’s testimony, the state would only seek a 12-month prison term, prompting the Movement for Quality Government to petition the High Court against the agreement.

    The anti-corruption watchdog believes Pinto’s punishment is too lenient in light of the severity of the crimes.

    Content is provided courtesy of the Jerusalem Post


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    1 Comment
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    lazerx
    lazerx
    9 years ago

    a good question is how reliable is a witness who is afraid of getting a heavy sentence, so he signs on to ‘co-operate’ with police to get a big fish.

    Since this person is getting a very reduced sentence, should his testimony be accepted? Where is Rabbi Hoffman’s opinion on this?