Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

New York - New Bill Introduced In Albany Would Cover Expensive IVF Treatments

Published on: May 27, 2015 11:41 AM
Change text size Text Size  

Albany, NY – A new bill introduced in Albany is looking to cover the expensive cost of in-vitro fertilization.

Sponsors of the bill said that the cost of in-vitro, ranging from $10,000 to $25,000 per treatment cycle, unfairly eliminates couples who can’t afford it from trying to have their own baby, according to the New York Post (http://bit.ly/1FYNF71 ).

Insurance ratepayers will have to cover the cost if the bill passes.

New York Health Plan Association spokeswoman Leslie Moran says that IVF is an elective procedure, and that New York state recognized that not everyone should have to pay higher premiums. If the bill passes, she says, it goes above necessary benefits insurers are required to cover under President Barack Obama’s health care law.

The Affordable Health Care Act and New York state laws do not require insurers to pay for in-vitro treatments.

Advertisement:

New York state laws do require insurers to provide coverage for some treatment procedures related to infertility treatment for women between the ages of 21 to 44, as well as for some prescription fertility drugs.



More of today's headlines

Gaza - A senior Hamas official says he is moving to the Gaza Strip for good, underscoring the gradual shift of the Islamic militant movement's power base from exile to... Tai'an, China - Wearing only his underpants, Gao Bingguo set a new Guinness World Record after he covered himself with almost 1.1 million bees, collectively weighing 240...

 

Total15

Read Comments (15)  —  Post Yours »

1

 May 27, 2015 at 11:46 AM Mazal1 Says:

About time. Back in the early 60's we spoke about this now we can get. By the way state government should help more in paying for the kids tuition and summer camp and new hats would be super duper.

2

 May 27, 2015 at 12:13 PM YUDA20 Says:

DOES THAT MEAN THAT THERE WILL BE NO MORE NEED FOR ORG. Like בונה עולם, A time etc.?

3

 May 27, 2015 at 01:02 PM Actuary Says:

I feel terrible for those who can't have children. Bonai Olim is prob one of the most worthy causes out there.
But its a big tragedy to make insurers pay for it. There are no free lunches. The middle class americans who actually must pay enorumous premiums with copays and deductibles will have to pay even more now to cover its costs. The world has gone wild with notion that everyone is entitled to everything. Another tax on the middle class.

4

 May 27, 2015 at 01:04 PM lavrenty Says:

the govt pays for welfare queens and illegals about time they help working people

5

 May 27, 2015 at 01:06 PM commonsense99 Says:

Dumbest Idea, I give to bonai olam because i want to, i should not be forced to pay higher taxes or premiums for this

6

 May 27, 2015 at 01:27 PM VachNacht Says:

The government sponsors senseless abortions, so why not do something worthwhile..

7

 May 27, 2015 at 01:50 PM Mazal1 Says:

Reply to #2  
YUDA20 Says:

DOES THAT MEAN THAT THERE WILL BE NO MORE NEED FOR ORG. Like בונה עולם, A time etc.?

No you are so wrong, did you read the article? All peoples are included.

8

 May 27, 2015 at 01:50 PM FlatbushMom Says:

Reply to #1  
Mazal1 Says:

About time. Back in the early 60's we spoke about this now we can get. By the way state government should help more in paying for the kids tuition and summer camp and new hats would be super duper.

What about rent vouchers specifically for Boro Park, Williamsburg, and Flatbush?Also, payment for 2 sets of dishes would be super duper too.

9

 May 27, 2015 at 03:12 PM Mazal1 Says:

Reply to #8  
FlatbushMom Says:

What about rent vouchers specifically for Boro Park, Williamsburg, and Flatbush?Also, payment for 2 sets of dishes would be super duper too.

We must be kindred spirits

10

 May 27, 2015 at 05:23 PM fleetwood Says:

Reply to #5  
commonsense99 Says:

Dumbest Idea, I give to bonai olam because i want to, i should not be forced to pay higher taxes or premiums for this

If thats so, then I shouldnt be forced to pay higher taxes or premiums for your dozens of pediatrician visits and prostate exams!

11

 May 27, 2015 at 06:21 PM IVF parant Says:

Me and my wife went thru ivf. It is very hard and difficult and yes very expensive and we don't have a lot of money. We did get help from Bonai Olam and we paid a lot out of pocket. But to say the government should force insurance to pay for it is a disaster. you guys can say what you want but if you think about it you will see that # 3 # 5 and all the others are rite. All of you (that pay for insurance including me) our premiums will only go up the insurance companys are not dumb.

12

 May 27, 2015 at 06:25 PM eli845 Says:

Reply to #10  
fleetwood Says:

If thats so, then I shouldnt be forced to pay higher taxes or premiums for your dozens of pediatrician visits and prostate exams!

You are making #5 point. If the government pays for something who's paying it? The government is not a business it has as much as you and me pay in

13

 May 27, 2015 at 07:34 PM boroparkermom Says:

Reply to #10  
fleetwood Says:

If thats so, then I shouldnt be forced to pay higher taxes or premiums for your dozens of pediatrician visits and prostate exams!

& you forgot to mention pay taxes for the "low income" that are collecting foodstamps, medicaid, section8 & school vouchers....

14

 May 28, 2015 at 12:08 AM AuthenticSatmar Says:

Once again special interest groups are at play here. While technically this is a medical problem, as a normal bodily function isn't functioning correctly, nonetheless it's one that doesn't affect one's ability to live. Also, IVF isn't treatment of the problem, it's an alternate solution to the end result.
On the other hand one can argue, if someone is blind, will insurance cover surgery to restore eyesight? How about expensive computers allowing them to read braille? Where do we draw the line? What's medical and what isn't?

15

 May 29, 2015 at 01:54 AM anon Says:

51% of my property tax goes to schooling. I'm infertile and can’t have children w/o IVF. If I bring a Doctors note to my tax authority will they waive 51% of my taxes?!? Of course not. So no tax credit and no IVF coverage’s - that’s double jeopardy.

Secondly, IVF coverage will actually bring down insurance rates! How? Because people won’t feel pressure to transfer more than 1 embryo at a time, as it would be covered anyway. Currently, with no coverage, people tend to transfer 2 or more embryos to increase their odds and avoid needing to pay for a second cycle. The fallout of transferring more than one embryo is multiple gestation pregnancy. Multiple gestation pregnancy make up almost all premi deliveries and a premi delivery can cost insurance more than $100k. So basically if insurance companies start covering IVF - yes they will increase payouts for fertility treatment but they will reduce payments for premi deliveries.

16

Sign-in to post a comment

Click here to sign-in.

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!