Washington – Economists Dump On Trump Boast To Bring Jobs Back From China

    8

    FILE - In this June 16, 2015 file photo, Donald Trump announces that he seek the Republican nomination for president, in the lobby of Trump Tower in New York. Trump vows to bring back the millions of American jobs lost to China and other foreign competitors if voters put him in the White House. Economists say he wouldn’t stand a chance: Trump’s boundless self-confidence is no match for the global economic forces that took those jobs away. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)Washington – Donald Trump vows to bring back the millions of American jobs lost to China and other foreign competitors if voters put him in the White House.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Economists say he wouldn’t stand a chance: Trump’s boundless self-confidence is no match for the global economic forces that took those jobs away.

    Since the beginning of 2000, the U.S. economy has lost 5 million manufacturing jobs. A study published last year by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that between 2 million and 2.4 million jobs were lost to competition from China from 1999 to 2011.

    Announcing his presidential bid June 16, Trump declared: “I’ll bring back our jobs from China, from Mexico, from Japan, from so many places. I’ll bring back our jobs, and I’ll bring back our money.”

    Economists were unimpressed. “It’s completely implausible,” says former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alan Blinder, a Princeton University economist who has studied the offshoring of American jobs.

    Companies shifted low-skill jobs to China in the 2000s because American workers couldn’t compete with Chinese workers earning around $1 an hour. Now China itself is losing low-wage manufacturing jobs to poorer countries such as Bangladesh and Vietnam.

    If America tried to block foreign-made products and make everything at home, prices would skyrocket and foreign countries would likely retaliate by blocking U.S. goods from their countries. “You can’t turn back the clock,” Blinder says.

    But there’s an even bigger problem for those who want to restore U.S. manufacturing employment (now 12.3 million) to its 1979 peak of 19.6 million: Technology has taken many of those jobs for good. Today’s high-tech factories employ a fraction of the workers they used to. General Motors, for example, employed 600,000 in the 1970s. It has 216,000 now — and sells more cars than ever.

    “No matter who becomes president,” says economist David Autor of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, “I cannot foresee a scenario where 5 million additional manufacturing jobs … reappear in the U.S. in the decades ahead.”

    That’s especially true with U.S. unemployment at a seven-year low 5.3 percent, a rate close to what economists consider full employment.

    “If you took all the jobs we outsourced and brought them back, you’d have negative unemployment,” says Harold Sirkin, senior partner at the Boston Consulting Group and an expert on manufacturing competitiveness worldwide. “We’d have to bring in people from other countries to do the work.”

    Trump, author of “The Art of the Deal,” says he could have protected American jobs by negotiating smarter trade agreements with U.S. competitors. “When was the last time anybody saw us beating, let’s say, China in a trade deal?” Trump said in June. “They kill us. I beat China all the time. All the time.”

    But economists say trade deals — for all the political heat they generate — play only a modest role in job creation. “Better trade deals are unlikely to be a panacea,” says Eswar Prasad, professor of trade policy at Cornell University.

    Prasad says U.S. policymakers should focus more on investing in things that will improve America’s competitiveness over the long haul — schools, roads and airports, for example. And Blinder says the U.S. should do more to retrain American workers who lose their jobs to foreign competition.

    Companies often decide where to locate factories and hire people on factors that can change: labor costs, energy bills, transportation expenses, proximity to customers.

    Currently, several of those factors favor the United States over China. The fracking boom has cut energy costs for U.S.-based factories. Chinese wages have soared, while American wages have been flat. In parts of America, land is cheaper than in China.

    So some American companies already are bringing jobs back, and some Chinese companies are investing in plants in America. Last year, for example, Chinese glassmaker Fuyao Glass Industry Group Co. announced plans to take over an abandoned GM plant in Moraine, Ohio, near Dayton, and create 800 jobs.

    The Reshoring Initiative, which encourages companies to bring operations back to America, says the number of manufacturing jobs created in the United States by returning American companies and foreign investors exceeded those lost to offshoring last year by 10,000 — modest, to be sure, but a big change from the massive job outflows of the 1990s and 2000s.

    Trump declared: “I will be the greatest jobs president that God ever created. I tell you that.”

    But Daniel Rosen, partner at the New York economic research firm Rhodium Group, says: “Global direct investment — including from China, Mexico and Japan — is already flowing into the United States, not due to God’s political leanings but because the U.S. economy is open both to those who would invest here and those who would decide to move abroad.”


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    8 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Geulah
    Geulah
    8 years ago

    The real issue is adaptation. The US has not adapted to the way the global economy works prefering to remain in the good ol’ days and yearning for them to come back. Once the air is out of the bottle, you can’t stuff it back in. Unfortunately cash hoarding multi-national companies don’t have an incentive to create domestic work and people have thrown in the towel prefering to live off of the government trough. Trump and Sanders keep blowing populist propaganda and as always the electorate will not wake up.

    CountryYossi
    CountryYossi
    8 years ago

    is Trump really so MESHUGA? dosent he know that the Unions destroyed America. This nutcase comes from Atlantic City where 5 major hotels closed down because of the union. And now with USA wants to give $15.00 an hour to a dishwasher and with all kinds of government inspections,new rules and regulations every other day HOW is he gonna compete with the poor countries who will do anything to make a American buck?
    Mr. Trump return to your real estate business and let Mrs. Clinton destroy this country.

    8 years ago

    Of course Trump CAN do it. One simple way to bring back from China the jobs that they are performing at $1 / hour, is to abolish that pesky 13th amendment to the US Constitution. For some Americans, that would solve so many other problems as well. Remember, Trump IS running as a Republican.

    hashomer
    hashomer
    8 years ago

    Trumpy continues his fact-free campaign since changes in the tax code, pushed by CORPORATIONS, led to the flight of companies to foreign countries (NAFTA) etc. The unions always fight to keep jobs here. We have no manufacturing because companies left to pay slave wages overseas, wirh no environmental or safety regulations.

    8 years ago

    I wonder where the ugly ties and overpriced shirts he tried to sell are made.

    Conscience
    Conscience
    8 years ago

    may the force of Life (G-D) be with this last bastion of Hope,
    the honorable Donald Trump
    for this once great land ….

    PMOinFL
    PMOinFL
    8 years ago

    He’s a moron. His Trump Signature Collection suits are made in Mexico and the dress shirts are made in China. I cannot believe how many idiots are fooled by the ramblings of this imbecile.