Washington – Democrats Say Iran Deal Will Survive Despite Congress Setback

    10

    A worshipper holding a headband that reads "Down with U.S." shouts anti-U.S. and anti-Israel slogans during Friday prayers in Tehran August 7, 2015.    REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi/Washington – Democrats said on Friday that they would have enough votes to ensure that the U.S.-led international nuclear deal with Iran survives review by Congress, despite influential Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer saying he would vote against it.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    A spokesman for Senator Dick Durbin, who counts Democratic votes as the Senate’s minority whip and who supports the deal, said Democrats were still confident they could rebuff Republican attempts to sink the agreement in a showdown next month.

    “The momentum is behind this deal, as you’ve seen from Democrats coming out this week,” spokesman Ben Marter said.

    Schumer, New York’s senior senator, announced late Thursday that he would oppose the nuclear pact between six world powers and Iran announced on July 14.

    President Barack Obama is trying to win over enough of his fellow Democrats to block Republican efforts to pass a “resolution of disapproval” that could cripple the deal, which is designed to curb Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for lifting of economic sanctions.

    Congress has until Sept. 17 to vote on such a measure. If it passes, as even many in Obama’s administration believe, there would be 22 days for the president to decide on a veto and Congress to try to override it.

    So far, at least 14 Senate Democrats and independents who vote with Democrats and about 34 House Democrats have announced they would back the deal. There are 46 members of the Democratic caucus in the 100-member Senate and 188 Democrats in the 435-member House.

    Most Republicans have already said they are opposed, as have a handful of House Democrats.

    Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, New York’s junior senator, announced her support on Thursday, hours before the announcement by Schumer. Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin announced on Friday she approved.

    WHITE HOUSE SHRUGS OFF SCHUMER

    Obama spokesman Josh Earnest said the White House was “not particularly” concerned that the decision by Schumer, the third-ranking Senate Democrat, would encourage more opposition.

    “We continue to be confident that the vast majority of Democrats in the United States Congress will make a decision based on their own conclusions and not on Senator Schumer’s,” Earnest said told reporters.

    Representative Eliot Engel of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, had also said on Thursday he opposed the deal.

    Democrats said neither Schumer nor Engel had been expected to be yes votes. Pressure on them and other Jewish lawmakers had grown as Israel’s government, and some pro-Israel lobbying groups, said the agreement would open the way for Iran to get a nuclear weapon and threaten Israel’s existence.

    However, if either had backed the deal, it could have tipped the balance strongly in favor of approval, Democratic aides said.

    Schumer said he would encourage fellow senators to oppose the agreement, and would vote to override a veto.

    A source closely tracking the issue said before Schumer’s decision, it appeared possible for Democrats to have mustered the 41 votes they needed to use procedural votes in the Senate to block the Republican vote to “disapprove” of the deal.

    Now, the fight will more likely be about ensuring they can keep Republicans from mustering the two-thirds majorities in both chambers to override an expected veto of the Republican move by Obama.

    Administration officials were blunt in their disappointment with Schumer, who had had multiple briefings by top Obama aides.

    Schumer came to meetings with a list of questions, but “those questions were lifted straight from AIPAC” a senior U.S. official said, referring to the pro-Israel lobbying group. “He came into it with a certain mindset,” the official said.

    Schumer said he made his decision “without regard to pressure, politics or party.”

    An aide in the House, where Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California is a strong backer of the deal, said nothing this week had altered Pelosi’s confidence that she had enough votes to sustain an Obama veto of a resolution of disapproval, if need be.‎


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    10 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    yidele1
    yidele1
    8 years ago

    this system is sooo corrupt ,why is it becoming a republican and democrat issue and not the real issue if the deal is good or bad , its just hate between the two parties where each one wants to show who is greater , what a shame

    yankee96
    yankee96
    8 years ago

    if Senator Schumer works to veto the president ,it will be an amazing accomplishment

    albroker
    albroker
    8 years ago

    What else is new gays like Baldwin, people of color and other assorted Marxists supporting their dear leader obama

    ayoyo
    ayoyo
    8 years ago

    What gullible fools we are. Obama and kerry will be making tons of money from this , as they have given the military industrial complex orders from the middle east that amount to uncountable amounts of money The whole agreement was meant to rev up the purchase of weapons in that part of the world .It is a great show The major players must laugh all night long.

    8 years ago

    obamas caged followers… latter they will say we just took orders. what next will obama want them to do?

    8 years ago

    All these idiot democrats need to make sure that they have secure,well built and well stocked bomb shelters somewhere in the boondocks because sure as hell the USA will be hit with an A-bomb just as soon as Iran has them.

    8 years ago

    While openly opposing it, deep down the republicans want the deal to go through via a minorty. They now have another 2016 campaign slogan. Just like Obama care was a gift to them in 2010 so is the Iran deal. They can now say the democrates like to shove stuff down the american citzens back against their will

    Isaac1
    Isaac1
    8 years ago

    My goodnes, how old ARE these people? Nya nya nya nya nah nah, it didn’t even hurt, we all knew its coming… Pffffftttt…. Outside of the blatant anti-Semitism of this white house, their maturity level is truly shocking. I almost expect this spokes- “person” to stick his thumbs in his ears and wave his grubby fingers around. Idiots.

    HeshyEkes
    HeshyEkes
    8 years ago

    If Obama wouldn’t have the votes to pass this abomination; Schumer would not have been allowed to vote against it as it is Schumer is not “allowed” to get other Democrats to vote against this “Deal”! Nebech!

    abilenetx
    abilenetx
    8 years ago

    Everybody does know when Obama leaves, all these people who lock step with him, will still have to live in this country like all us other peons don’t they??? They are so absorbed into a fantasy world, but they will have to wake up and with a bankrupt system, poor medical system, and a very diminished military, they too will have to be here with us peons no matter what party you vote or politician , you all know that don’t you???