Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Washington - Analysis: Obama Crosses Own Red Line With Syrian Deployment

Published on: October 31, 2015 10:51 PM
By: APĀ 
Change text size Text Size  
Russia's President Vladimir Putin (2nd L), Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (R, front), U.S. President Barack Obama (L) and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry attend a meeting on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, September 28, 2015.  ReutersRussia's President Vladimir Putin (2nd L), Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (R, front), U.S. President Barack Obama (L) and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry attend a meeting on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, September 28, 2015.  Reuters

Washington - Even when President Barack Obama sent U.S. troops back to Iraq and ordered the military to stay in Afghanistan, he insisted Syria would remain off limits for American ground forces. Now he’s crossed his own red line.

Obama’s announcement Friday that he was deploying up to 50 U.S. special operations troops into northern Syria to assist in the fight against the Islamic State group is the kind of incremental move that has defined his second-term Mideast strategy.

Advertisement:

The U.S. military footprint in the region is growing. But each step is on a small scale, so as to reassure Americans that Obama isn’t plunging their country into another large, open-ended conflict.

While the strategy may help ease them back into the realities of war, experts and some of Obama’s political allies say his slow ramp-up may not be enough to defeat the fast-moving militants.

“Deploying a handful of U.S. special operations forces to Syria will not change this situation significantly,” said Frederic Hof, Obama’s former Syria special adviser. “It is a Band-Aid of sorts.”

Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said the latest escalation “is unlikely to succeed in achieving our objective of defeating IS and instead threatens to embroil the United States in Syria’s civil war.”

The military campaign against IS is nowhere near the size and scope of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama repeatedly has used the costly and unpopular Iraq War as an example of what he’s tried to avoid.

But it was the location, not the number, that elevated the significance of his Syrian decision. It was the first time the U.S. has openly sent forces into Syria, expanding the geographic reach of Obama’s military efforts in the Middle East.

For years, the president has said Syria was precisely the kind of situation he was elected to keep the U.S. military from. Washington has no partners in the Syrian government and few good options among opposition leaders. There is no ground force that the U.S. can quickly train.

But the crisis has become unavoidable for Obama, particularly since IS crossed the border into Iraq. A civil war that Obama once could pin on Syrians to settle has now threatened to upend the entire region.

Obama’s first move was to send a few hundred U.S. troops to Iraq to train and assist local forces fighting IS. That was a return to Iraq for the U.S. military after the 2011 withdrawal, which was a fulfillment of Obama’s campaign promise to end the war he inherited from President George W. Bush.

But over the past year, the number of U.S. troops in Iraq has expanded to about 3,300. Also, the U.S. began airstrikes against IS in Iraq and Syria.

Despite killing as many as 12,000 militants, the bombing has not significantly weakened the IS’ capacity to hold territory, and foreign fighters and others have replenished the group’s ranks.

Obama had hoped a ground force trained by Americans elsewhere in the region would have complemented the strikes in Syria. But the train-and-equip program failed; Obama abandoned it this fall.

The new U.S. deployment into Syria essentially replaces that effort.

The decision allows Obama, under pressure by the Pentagon and international partners to make progress against IS, to make the case that he’s trying new ways to address the crisis. The White House contends Obama isn’t backtracking on his commitment to keep U.S. troops out of Syria because the new military presence is narrow.

But to some, the White House appears to be more concerned about being able to keep that political promise than in taking more substantial action to resolve the situation.

“War has a harsh reality in that in order to have an effect you have to be present,” said Jerry Hendrix, a retired Navy flight officer and the director of the Defense Strategies and Assessments Program at the Center for a New American Security.

The White House put no timetable on how long the American forces will stay. Obama has said he expects the fight against IS in Iraq and Syria to last beyond his presidency.

Secretary of State John Kerry said Saturday he wasn’t ruling out a further U.S. escalation of the fight and that he couldn’t predict the future.

Only two weeks ago, Obama said he was reversing course and keeping American troops in Afghanistan beyond next year.

That means the president who inherited two military conflicts will likely hand his successor three.



More of today's headlines

Washington - Former President George W. Bush believes his brother Jeb should stop defending the White House decisions the elder Bush made, and he is seeking to reassure... Damascus - A newly formed U.S.-backed Syrian rebel alliance on Saturday launched an offensive against Islamic State in the northeast province of Hasaka, a day after the...

 

Total3

Read Comments (3)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Nov 01, 2015 at 01:50 AM Anonymous Says:

just look at how Putin is looking at the drek.. I think he is thinking "this is what they elected, TWICE?"

2

 Nov 01, 2015 at 12:36 PM Anonymous Says:

Indeed the entire world is amazed at how stupid a majority of Americans could be, to have elected him not once, but twice! This lying, incompetent empty suit can't even stick to his own self serving policies. Lets even what all the brown-nosed liberal Obama-lovers who post here, will say to excuse this latest flip flop of his,...

3

 Nov 01, 2015 at 03:37 PM Anonymous Says:

Is that that the same red line that was drawn against Basshar-Assad when he used chemical warfare against civilians?

4

Sign-in to post a comment

Click here to sign-in.

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!