New York – Families Of Cancer Victims Blast Ex-Speaker Silver; Say Illegal Scheme Was Costly

    8

    FILE - Former New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver exits the Manhattan U.S. District Courthouse in New York, November 3, 2015. REUTERSNew York – Families of cancer represented by the law firm of former Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver are blasting the former pol, saying that being caught in the crossfire of his “illegal quid pro quo” scam cost them financially in their settlements.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    NYPOST.com (http://bit.ly/1GYTySP) reports that in one case, Cape Cod, MA resident Andrea Rega—whose father Aniello was one of dozens of patients referred to Silver’s Weitz & Luxenberg law firm by Columbia University Doctor Robert Taub in exchange for $500,000 in state research grants—says she believes lawyers would have worked a lot harder on her father’s case if one-third of the money hadn’t been going directly to Silver.

    “I’m convinced the law firm would’ve worked much harder for my father’s case if they weren’t giving Sheldon Silver the 33 percent. That’s why the law firm wasn’t working as hard as they could — because somebody else was taking the money,” Rega said.

    The feds claim Silver netted more than $3.3M off the scheme.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    8 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Oyvey
    Oyvey
    8 years ago

    Silver, I’m sure did not get the 33%. He definitely had to split it with the firm with the firm getting most of it. These people are mistaken about who got how much.

    Aron1
    Active Member
    Aron1
    8 years ago

    Factually ambiguous. Silver wasn’t getting 33% of the settlement money. He was at most getting 33% of the share that the law firm was getting. A common and legal practice.
    Actually, it might spur the firm to work harder, so that it’s share is increased to offset Silver’s cut.
    Very easy to find former clients with sour grapes. Doesn’t make it a valid complaint or illegal.

    mewhoze
    mewhoze
    8 years ago

    I believe #1 is correct. in all such cases the law firm gets a percentage of the settlement. not sure how much. but its not done for free and lawyers don’t take on cases unless they expect to win and make money

    8 years ago

    Yes its heresay.

    Sol-Sol
    Sol-Sol
    8 years ago

    Anyone has the right to get a finders or referral fee from a law firm.

    If Mr Silver sent clients he was entitled to get a cut of the win. It’s a no brainer.
    The client doesn’t have to like it and didn’t have to chose this law firm. Claiming that the lawyers would have worked much harder if they didn’t have to share is ridiculous, these type of lawyers make a percentage of what they win, this way they always have an incentive to put in their upmost best efforts.

    So far I don’t see what Silver did wrong.

    8 years ago

    If Silver were not Frum, you would want him jailed. Same thing with Weberman and Rubashkin.

    8 years ago

    Shelly it’s OVER. Throw yourself on the mercy of the court. Bow out of Albany GRACEFULLY and enjoy your senior years in the Golden state, not in a rusted jail cell.