Los Angeles – Eye On Safety, California Sets Rules For Self-Driving Cars

    1

    FILE - In this May 13, 2014 file photo, a Google self-driving car goes on a test drive near the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, Calif.  California unveiled precedent-setting draft rules Wednesday that would slow the public's access to self-driving cars of the future until regulators are confident the technology is safe.  (AP Photo/Eric Risberg, File)Los Angeles – California regulators have unveiled a roadmap that would let consumers begin using self-driving cars, though manufacturers would have to prove the emerging technology is safe before a licensed driver could get chauffeured around town.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The approach California’s Department of Motor Vehicles offered Wednesday in precedent-setting draft regulations is cautious, though it does allow that Californians could be behind the wheel of a self-driving car by 2017.

    Among other safety-related requirements, the cars must have a steering wheel, and a licensed driver must be ready to take over if the machine fails.

    Google, which is pushing to get cars without a steering wheel or pedals to consumers, expressed “grave disappointment” with the rules, which the tech giant said would slow deployment of technology with huge life-saving potential.

    Though no manufacturer has said it thinks the cars are ready just yet, at least a dozen are developing the technology. Google has suggested a model could be ready for limited use sooner than the public expects. In September, the safety chief of its self-driving car project, Ron Medford, said the technology is “close to working pretty damn well.”

    California’s go-slow approach could benefit Texas, which this summer emerged as a competitor in the deployment of self-driving cars when officials in the capital Austin welcomed Google prototypes for professional testing.

    “Given the potential risks associated with deployment of such a new technology, DMV believes that manufacturers need to obtain more experience in testing driverless vehicles on public roads prior to making this technology available to the general public,” the agency said in a written summary of its draft regulations.

    Those draft rules set out how the DMV wants to move beyond the current small-scale testing of prototypes on public roads. The DMV can change the rules over the coming months before they are finalized, and the industry is sure to contest them as overly burdensome.

    There are no comprehensive federal rules addressing the technology, and as the largest auto market in the U.S., rules in California are a landmark in the development of self-driving technology.

    Under California’s framework, Google couldn’t sell a driverless car, even if it deems the car safe. Instead, manufacturers would receive a permit for three years, during which time consumers could lease the cars but manufacturers would be required to keep tabs on how safely they are driving and report that performance to the state.

    Before the DMV grants that three-year permit, an independent certifier would need to verify a manufacturer’s safety assurances. Drivers would need special, manufacturer-provided training, then get a special certification on their licenses.

    If a car breaks the law, the driver would be responsible.

    Though the timeline for public access is squishy, in principle the DMV could finalize the rules and a manufacturer could satisfy the safety requirements as early as 2017.

    That said, the draft rules may also forestall the technology’s public rollout.

    “This points to a very long slog ahead for not just Google, but really other automakers as well — and probably some confirmation that developers of these technologies should be pivoting away from California,” said Bryant Walker Smith, a law professor at the University of South Carolina who studies self-driving car regulation. “California’s proposed rules are fantastic news for Texas.”

    Austin’s mayoral spokesman Jason Stanford said his city’s government believes self-driving cars are “legal and safe” already and that the city is “thrilled to host innovative ideas like this.”

    California has grappled for several years with how to regulate the technology. The DMV said it wanted regulations to protect public safety, but not be too onerous so that signature companies such as Google will be stifled in developing a technology that could prove safer than human drivers.

    After all, cars that can safely drive themselves under all conditions wouldn’t rely on drivers who may be drowsy, distracted, buzzed — or unable to drive because of their age or a disability. Boosters say the technology could prevent many of the more than 32,000 deaths on U.S. roads each year.

    The cars use a suite of sensors — including radar, lasers and cameras — and onboard computers to drive. Many also rely on maps that detail everything from curb heights to the exact placement of lane stripes.

    Eleven companies already have permission to test on California’s public roads, with Ford the latest addition. There have been scattered collisions, nearly all involving Google cars. Those collisions have been minor and the tech giants says each has been caused by drivers of other cars.

    Google spokesman Johnny Luu said the company was “gravely disappointed” by the draft regulations.

    “Safety is our highest priority and primary motivator as we do this,” he said in a written statement.

    Meanwhile, a consumer group applauded the draft rules as appropriately cautious.

    The DMV “did exactly what they should do, which is put the public safety first — and then take steps that promote the technology in a safe way,” said John Simpson, privacy project director at Consumer Watchdog and frequent Google critic.

    Though the result of more than a year of deliberation, the draft regulations must undergo months of review before they are set. The DMV intends to hold informal workshops for public input in January and February, and hopes — after making any changes — to publish final regulations later in 2016.

    The DMV could then tackle regulations for cars with no driver inside.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    1 Comment
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    HeshyEkes
    HeshyEkes
    8 years ago

    Typical Democratic controlled liberal state. If Google is ready to sell self driving cars, why the H*ll is CA stopping them by requiring a steering wheel & licensed driver? Do the bright minds in the Govt not realize that Google with a valuation of over $500 Billion dollars has deep enough pockets to cover any liability if their cars cause any injuries or damages? Unless Google was SURE the cars were 100% safe they wouldn’t risk the harm it would do to their reputation. CA, like all liberals want to be our mommy & daddy to protect us; and want to protect the car industry who are developing their own self driving cars but are doing it incrementally instead of starting with a new sheet of paper & redesigning the car from the ground up.

    I got one can hardly wait when I can send my grandchildren across town by themselves or when I can read, surf the Internet or take a nap as I’m driving on the interstate (things I do today, but since I’m the driver, much riskier with today’s cars! LOL)