Boise, ID – Trump Opponents Try To Beat Him At The Electoral College

    20

    Melinda Smyser, one of Idaho’s four presidential electors, poses for a portrait in Boise, Idaho, Thursday, Nov. 17, 2016. (AP Photo/Otto Kitsinger)Boise, ID – Grassroots campaigns have sprung up around the country to try to persuade members of the Electoral College to do something that has never been done in American history — deny the presidency to the clear Election Day winner.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Activists are circulating online petitions and using social media in hopes of influencing Republican electors to cast their ballots for someone other than President-elect Donald Trump and deprive him of the 270 Electoral College votes needed to become the next occupant of the White House.

    “Yes, I think it’s a longshot, but I also think we’re living in strange times,” said Daniel Brezenoff, who created a petition in favor of Hillary Clinton and is asking signers to lobby electors by email or phone. “If it was ever plausible, it’s this year.”

    Trump has won 290 electoral votes to Clinton’s 232, with Michigan undecided, but Clinton is on pace to win the popular vote by at least 1 million ballots. Trump’s opponents are motivated by the outcome of the popular vote and by their contention that the businessman and reality TV star is unfit to serve as commander in chief.

    Just one elector so far has wavered publicly on supporting Trump.

    Texas Republican Art Sisneros says he has reservations about the president-elect, but not because of the national popular vote. He told The Associated Press he won’t vote for Clinton under any circumstance.

    “As a Christian, I came to the conclusion that Mr. Trump is not biblically qualified for that office,” he said.

    He said he has heard from ecstatic Clinton supporters and even supportive Republicans, but also from outraged Trump backers writing “threatening and vile things.”

    Sisneros signed a state party pledge to support the GOP’s standard-bearer, but that was before Trump was the official nominee. He said one of his options is to resign, allowing the state party to choose another elector.

    Electors are chosen by party officials and are typically the party’s most loyal members. Presidential electors are not required to vote for a particular candidate under the Constitution. Even so, the National Archives says more than 99 percent of electors have voted as pledged throughout the nation’s history.

    Some state laws call for fines against “faithless electors,” while others open them to possible felony charges, although the National Archives says no elector has ever been prosecuted for failing to vote as pledged. In North Carolina, a faithless elector’s vote is canceled, and he or she must immediately resign and be replaced.
    In a photo from Thursday, Nov. 17, 2016, Oakland University senior Michael Banerian stands on campus in Rochester, Mich. Banerian, a Republican representative to the Electoral College has been receiving death threats. (AP Photo/Jose Juarez)
    Layne Bangerter and Melinda Smyser, two of Idaho’s four Republican electors, said they have been flooded with emails, telephone calls and Facebook messages from strangers urging them to reconsider their vote.

    “It’s just not going to work,” Bangerter said. “I hope it dies down, but I don’t see that happening.”

    The volume and tone of the messages caught the attention of Idaho’s secretary of state, who urged the public to remain civil as electors prepare to cast their ballots on Dec. 19 while meeting in their states.

    Republican Party officials in Georgia and Michigan said their electors also have been bombarded with messages, and Iowa reported increased public interest in obtaining contact information for electors.

    Michael Banerian, 22, one of Michigan’s 16 Republican electors, said he has received death threats from people who do not want him to vote for Trump. But he said he is undeterred.

    “It’s mostly just a lot of angry people who don’t completely understand how the process works,” said Banerian, a political science major at Oakland University.

    P. Bret Chiafalo, a Democratic elector in Washington state, said he and a small group of other electors from the party are working to contact their Republican counterparts and ask them to vote for any GOP candidate besides Trump, preferably Mitt Romney or John Kasich.

    Under the Constitution, the House — currently under Republican control — decides the presidency if no candidate reaches the required electoral vote majority. House members choose from the top three contenders.

    This isn’t the first time electors have faced pressure to undo the results of Election Day.

    Carole Jean Jordan, a GOP elector from Florida in 2000, recalled the “unbelievably ugly” aftermath of the recount battle between George W. Bush and then-vice president Al Gore, a dispute that ended with the U.S. Supreme Court leaving Bush’s slim margin intact and handing him the presidency.

    Jordan said Florida’s electors were inundated with nasty letters from people saying they should not vote for Bush. Police kept watch over her home until the electors convened in Tallahassee to cast their votes. They stayed at the same hotel, guarded by security officers who also escorted them to cast their ballots at the state Capitol.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    20 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    7 years ago

    Good luck they tried the same shtick in the republican primaries. And its pretty clear the man won Michigan too.

    AlbertEinstein
    AlbertEinstein
    7 years ago

    Nebbach, the left-wingnuts are so in shock they’re trying desperate, futile measures to counter their denial.

    They need serious psychological help.

    Liepa
    Liepa
    7 years ago

    What they’re attempting to do is change the rules after the game has been played and their side lost. I would call that chutzpah but its worse than that, it’s pretty stupid.

    jayclass
    jayclass
    7 years ago

    More then 3 million votes for Hillary Clinton were from ilegals and are fraudulent according to a recent published investigation done by an independent monitor so she actually lost the popular vote and possibly a few states too where she won with tight margins like NH VA NV CO and more!

    schmaltzy
    schmaltzy
    7 years ago

    Funny isn’t it? When Trump said he might not accept the results of the election if he loses the Dems were aghast. How can he question the results of a legitimate election?No that they are the losers, they have been mobilizing from Day 1 to de-legitimize the results. Can you think of greater hypocrisy?

    bsnow
    bsnow
    7 years ago

    Liberal good try. Not gonna happen.
    LOSERS!

    DMD45
    DMD45
    7 years ago

    More democrap gannovim and gannoferai !!! דמד

    7 years ago

    To #9 -You have no sachel; the latter statement is not an attack, but a statement of fact. Article Two of the United States Constitution, mandated the electoral college. The Constitution of the USA was approved at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, or two hundred and twenty nine years ago! The electors are chosen by the various state legislatures. Each state is entitled to the total amount of electors which equal the amount of representatives in Congress, plus the two Senators. Whoever wins a majority of the vote in each state, is awarded the total amount of electors. Trump won the election fair and square. If you don’t like the results, then request that the Constitution be amended. However, it would take 38 state legislatures to approve such a change. Since Trump won 32 states, I doubt if the various state legislatures would approve an amendment to the Constitution, to abolish the Electoral College. I’d like to paraphrase what President Franklin Delano Roosevelt told Congress on Dec. 8, 1941:
    “With the unbounded determination of our people, we have gained the inevitable triumph, so help us G-d”.

    thikingjew
    thikingjew
    7 years ago

    Right now we have anti-gun-activists calling for an armed revolution, which if you think about it, is pretty funny. They don’t stand a chance against the hand-guns of the police.

    If they heaven forbid switch the vote, it will be gun-rights-activists calling for an armed revolution. This is deadly serious. They have better guns and better training than the typical police officer (if you don’t believe me, look up frontsight.com, the paramilitary training facility for the NRA).

    If the liberals think that they can threaten the USA’s democracy with flipping a few cars and burning a few flags, they (as usual) have not been paying attention to the NRA. Their attempts to bully the election process are nothing compared to what the NRA might do if the electors capitulate.