Washington – FACT CHECK: Trump Uses Bogus Claim To Knock Media On Reports

    9

    Panoramic of President Donald Trump's Inauguration at the Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., January 20, 2017.  REUTERS/Ricky Carioti/Pool Washington – President Donald Trump’s speech at the headquarters of the Central Intelligence Agency turned into the latest battle in, as he put it, his “running war with the media.”

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    He had two central complaints Saturday: that the media misrepresented the size of the crowd at his inauguration and that it was incorrectly reported a bust of Martin Luther King Jr. was removed from the Oval Office.

    A look at those assertions:

    TRUMP: “I made a speech. I looked out. The field was — it looked like a million, a million and a half people.”

    The president went on to say that one network “said we drew 250,000 people. Now that’s not bad. But it’s a lie.” He then claimed that were 250,000 right by the stage and the “rest of the, you know, 20-block area, all the way back to the Washington Monument was packed.”

    “So we caught them,” said Trump. “And we caught them in a beauty. And I think they’re going to pay a big price.”

    THE FACTS: Trump is wrong. Photos of the National Mall from his inauguration make clear that the crowd did not extend to the Washington Monument. Large swaths of empty space are visible on the Mall.

    Thin crowds and partially empty bleachers also dotted the inaugural parade route. Hotels across the District of Columbia reported vacancies, a rarity for an event as large as a presidential inauguration.

    And ridership on the Washington’s Metro system didn’t match that of recent inaugurations.

    As of 11 a.m. that day, there were 193,000 trips taken, according to the transit service’s Twitter account. At the same hour eight years ago, there had been 513,000 trips. Four years later, there were 317,000 for Obama’s second inauguration. There were 197,000 at 11 a.m. in 2005 for President George W. Bush’s second inauguration.

    White House press secretary Sean Spicer later added to the misstatements.

    Spicer claimed that it was the first time white “floor coverings” were used to protect the grass on the National Mall and that it drew attention to any empty space. But the same tarp was used four years ago.

    Spicer also said it was “the first time that fencing and magnetometers went as far back on the Mall, preventing hundreds of thousands of people from being able to access the Mall as quickly as they had in inaugurations past.”
    FILE - This Jan. 19, 2013 file photo shows crews laying down special mats to protect the lawn on the National Mall, for the 57th Presidential Inauguration in Washington. White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer incorrectly said Saturday, Jan. 21 that 2017 was “the first time in our nation’s history that floor coverings had been used to protect the grass on the mall.”  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
    The Secret Service says that this was the first time security fencing was installed around the National Mall for an inauguration. To get onto the Mall, people were required to go through one of seven checkpoints where their bags were checked, but there were no magnetometers used at those checkpoints.

    A law enforcement official not authorized to publicly discuss the inauguration says officials were “not aware of any issues with flow rate in and around the National Mall.”

    Spicer then said, “This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration — period — both in person and around the globe.”

    He offered no evidence and there is no immediate way to confirm such a claim.

    But photo taken during Barack Obama’s 2009 inauguration showed substantially more people on the Mall. It is not known how many people watched the ceremony on television around the globe. In the U.S., Nielsen estimates 31 million viewers watched TV coverage, but that’s less than Barack Obama’s and Ronald Reagan’s first inaugurations.

    The exact size of the crowd Friday may never be known. The National Park Service stopped providing estimates in the 1990s.

    ___

    TRUMP: The president also went after a reporter who incorrectly wrote that the president had removed a bust of Martin Luther King Jr. from the Oval Office. The reporter later acknowledged the error, saying a Secret Service agent and a door had obstructed his view of the bust when reporters were allowed into the room briefly after Trump’s swearing in.

    “But this is how dishonest the media is,” Trump said.

    “Now, big story, the retraction was like, where?” he asked. “Was it a line or do they even bother running it?”

    THE FACTS: Trump is right. The reporter for Time magazine made an error. The White House said Trump never removed the King bust from the Oval Office.

    The error about the bust was first transmitted in a pool report distributed among reporters. The White House often uses a pool system when not all reporters who want to attend an event can be accommodated in a space.

    At 7:30 p.m., reporter Zeke Miller wrote a pool report saying, “The MLK bust was no longer on display.”

    Once Miller realized his error, an update was sent to the pool. “The MLK bust remains in the Oval Office, in addition to the Churchill bust, per a WH aide. It was apparently obscured by a door and an agent during the spray. Your pool offers sincerest apologies.”

    Miller also corrected the error on Twitter, and Time magazine corrected its story based on his report.

    “Correction: An earlier version of the story said that a bust of Martin Luther King had been moved. It is still in the Oval Office,” it reads.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    9 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    7 years ago

    This article is a flawed and biased one. In fact, there was a larger television audience viewing Trump’s inauguration, than the amount of viewers which viewed Obama’s second inauguration in 2013; however, the latter fact was conveniently left out. Since the U.S. Park Police, and U.S. Capitol Police cannot definitively or accurately report how many people actually viewed the inauguration (by their own admission, since they don’t give those figures out), the news media has no business, stating how large the crowds were or were not. Secondly, everyone will notice that the false reporting of the removal of the bust of Dr. Martin Luther King, was conveniently placed at the end of this article. It wasn’t even referenced in the headline of this biased article! I knew even before that bogus claim was announced that someone in the news media would allege that it was removed, since a bust of Winston Churchill was placed there. The false reporting was a premeditated act, which the press won’t admit to. Stay tuned, as the news media, has declared war on Donald Trump. Trump should state what John Paul Jones stated during the War of 1812- “I have not yet begun to fight”.

    Lazer
    Lazer
    7 years ago

    It sure will be nice when the news organizaions beging reporting news – not making news or focusing on the absurd areas meant to harm OUR president.

    GET OVER IT as Obama once said. TRUMP won.

    qazxc
    qazxc
    7 years ago

    He wanted to be president? Presidents live under the scrutiny of the press. GET OVER IT.

    Teddybear
    Teddybear
    7 years ago

    Can’t swallow
    Go fly a kite

    7 years ago

    This is just another sign of the immaturity of the Trump people. Who cares how many people were at the inauguration? I don’t recall any other president bragging about the crowd number at his inauguration. It does not matter. Please move on to governing and fulfilling your campaign promises.

    Mark Levin
    Mark Levin
    7 years ago

    There are many reasons why Clinton News Network is mis-claiming the numbers other than sheer bias. The grass was covered for the first time.

    Heard from people there, that Trump’s people are not that far off.