Washington – House To Vote On Health Care Bill Thursday

    24

    Reps. Billy Long, R-Mo., second from right,  speaks to reporters at the White House in Washington, Wednesday, May 3, 2017, following a meeting with President Donald Trump on health care reform. He is joined by, from left, Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas,  and Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., and Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)Washington – The House will vote Thursday on GOP legislation to repeal and replace Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, as Republicans finally aim to deliver on seven years of campaign promises that helped them gain control of Congress and the White House.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    But the move announced late Wednesday by GOP leaders also carries extreme political risk, as House Republicans prepare to endorse a bill that boots millions off the insurance rolls and may not even survive the Senate.

    “We will pass this bill,” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., confidently predicted after a day of wrangling votes and personal arm-twisting by President Donald Trump.

    Pressed by reporters as he exited a meeting in Speaker Paul Ryan’s office, McCarthy protested: “We’re gonna pass it! We’re gonna pass it! Let’s be optimistic about life!”

    After an earlier defeat when Republican leaders were forced to pull the bill for lack of votes, the decision to move forward indicated confidence on the part of GOP leaders. Failure would be catastrophic. But a successful outcome would make good on the GOP’s No. 1 goal of undoing Obama’s signature legislative achievement, and provide a long-sought win for Trump, who has been in office more than 100 days without a significant congressional victory save Senate confirmation of a Supreme Court justice.

    The White House had aggressively pushed House leaders to act, and Trump got heavily involved in recent days, working the phones and personally agreeing to changes earlier Wednesday that brought two pivotal Republicans back on board. Reps. Fred Upton of Michigan and Billy Long of Missouri emerged from a White House meeting with Trump saying they could now support the bill, thanks to the addition of $8 billion over five years to help people with pre-existing conditions.

    “‘We need you, we need you, we need you,'” Long described as the message from a president eager for a victory.

    Democrats stood firmly united against the health bill. But they generally applauded a separate $1 trillion-plus spending measure to keep the government running, which passed the House on a bipartisan vote of 309-118 earlier Wednesday.

    The latest iteration of the GOP health care bill would let states escape requirements that insurers provide a menu of basic services like preventive care and charge healthy and seriously ill customers the same rates — changes that brought a key group of conservatives on board last week. Overall, the legislation would cut the Medicaid program for the poor, eliminate fines for people who don’t buy insurance and provide generally skimpier subsidies. The American Medical Association, AARP and other consumer and medical groups are opposed. The AMA issued a statement saying the changes sought by Upton and Long “tinker at the edges without remedying the fundamental failing of the bill — that millions of Americans will lose their health insurance as a direct result.”

    If the GOP bill became law, congressional analysts estimate that 24 million more Americans would be uninsured by 2026, including 14 million by next year.

    When the health bill does come to a vote Thursday it will be without an updated analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office about its cost and affect, a point Democrats complained about bitterly.

    “Forcing a vote without a CBO score shows that Republicans are terrified of the public learning the full consequences of their plan,” said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. “But tomorrow, House Republicans are going to tattoo this moral monstrosity to their foreheads, and the American people will hold them accountable.”

    Even with Upton and Long in the “yes” column, GOP leaders had spent the day hunting for votes among wary moderates. More than a dozen opponents said they were still no despite the latest changes. GOP leaders can lose only 22 from their ranks and still pass the bill, and an Associated Press tally found 19 opposed even after Upton and Long got on board. But late in the day Wednesday at least two more Republicans — Daniel Webster of Florida and David Young of Iowa — also reversed their opposition and announced support for the bill.

    Even so, Thursday’s margin could be razor-thin, much like when “Obamacare” itself cleared the House in 2010 on a party-line vote of 219-212. The GOP has been trying ever since to repeal the law even as around 20 million Americans gained coverage under it. On Thursday Republicans might succeed for the first time in passing a repeal bill that may have a chance of getting signed into law.

    As they have throughout the debate, Republicans argued that Obama’s health law is collapsing under its own weight, and they must intervene to save it. They argue that their plan will provide consumers with lower premiums and more choices, removing the unpopular mandates that require most Americans to carry insurance or face fines. Several Republican lawmakers pointed to news out of Iowa this week that the last carrier of individual health insurance policies in most of the state might stop offering them to residents.

    “That’s why we have to make sure this passes, to save those people from Obamacare that continues to collapse,” McCarthy said.

    Separately, on the spending bill to keep the government running, Trump and GOP leaders hailed it as a victory, citing increases in money for the military. The $1.1 trillion spending bill was the bipartisan result of weeks of negotiations in which top Democrats like Pelosi successfully blocked Trump’s most controversial proposals, including a down payment on his oft-promised Mexico border wall, cuts to popular domestic programs, and new punishments for so-called sanctuary cities.

    Now that it’s passed the House, the mammoth, 1,665-page measure to fund the government through September heads to the Senate, which is also expected to approve it. Trump has promised to sign it.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    24 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    6 years ago

    Us hard working middle class not entitled to subsidies hope it passes . We don’t want to get stuck with a bill that makes us pay for the sick . The notion that pre existing conditions should have a right to coverage at no extra charge is ludicrous and a tax on the rest of us healthy lives . Note we are not discussing one who is already insured and gets sick . That was already illegal to charge more just bec he got sick . We are discussing those that took a cheap plan or no plan but when sick need the best plan .

    Re medicad cuts . Let medicad recipients pay what they pay for their iPhone . If they had some responsibility to pay like a copay they would both save money and make smarter health choices . So yes even $30 a month would go a long way

    6 years ago

    Since I know it’s coming let me describe what will happen if we just introduce a unversial health care plan aka medicad for all .

    1) expect long lines by the dr
    2) innovative treatment and experimental stuff will be denied
    3) no end of life choices

    Those that do want more choices will have to purchase their own supplemental insurance . At the end of the day I don’t see how that would bring down costs . Our country had the greatest health care. People fly from all over the world for our second to none facilities . We pay more than other advanced countries but get more . I have yet to meet someone who flies to South Africa for its top notch socialized health care. Our system is top notch .

    So what about those evil corporations whose ceo take top dollar ? Isn’t that driving up costs ? No . Efficiencies in the private sector vs the government far outweigh those costs . Efficiencies like automation or work on wellness are just some examples . Big pharma may be a problem still . But I would never want to trade in private insurance

    Realistic
    Realistic
    6 years ago

    Can anyone tell me where I can find a brief description of this bill? I tend to prefer to make educated decisions. I was searching around, but didn’t get my questions answered.

    1. In states that will not opt out from preexisting condition protection. What will prevent people from buying insurance only when they become sick (in the absence of an individual mandate)?

    2. What is going to happen with all these insurance exchanges run by the government. Will they cease to exist?

    3. Regarding the amount allocated for high risk pools. Will this money be for all states? or just states that drop Obamacare protections? If so, why should states be penalized for protecting sick people? will the amount allocated for high risk pools remain the same regardless of how many states will opt out of the Obamacare protections?

    yonasonw
    Member
    yonasonw
    6 years ago

    Caution about TrumpISprez4-8

    In a posting about Gorka earlier this week, he openly questioned whether we should be concerned about neo-Nazi connections to administration officials. His exact words were “…You have yet to address the issue as to why these neo nazis ties (If true) should concern us…”

    He asks why Jews should be concerned about “neo Nazi ties.” Really!

    Perhaps I’m oversensitive, as the son of a survivor in a family that lost many people in the Shoah, but I don’t think so.

    I question whether any Jew could have posted such a comment…so I wonder whether TrumpISprez4-8 is what he holds himself out to be.

    afzaw
    afzaw
    6 years ago

    To 4: I question his IQ also

    afzaw
    afzaw
    6 years ago

    To TrumpISprez4-8. You are very gullible and will instantly defend , without any deep thought, anything that this Administration does. You also will instantly disregard anything not said by this Administration as fake news.
    Even discussions which are complicated and complex and have multiple nuances and affect tens of millions of people you feel that you can support and defend everything that this Administration does.
    For example: Healthcare is complicated and it affects tens of millions of people. There are always pros and cons to every bill . Not everyone on medicaid or medicare or has a pre existing condition is a bad person who does not deserve healthcare and is just trying to game the system and steal your money.
    The insurance companies are only in this to make a profit . They are not dedicated to taking care of people. There has to be a balance between what the insurance companies are allowed to get away with for the sake of profits and what they must be required to pay for for the sake of taking care of people.
    Take a step back and realize that there are at least 2 sides to every topic. Not everything that makes the President look bad is fake news.
    1/2

    afzaw
    afzaw
    6 years ago

    Be realistic and recognize that even the Republicans and Trump, like all people – especially politicians – have ulterior motives to what they do. Be a little cynical in the news that you hear because all media, including breitbart , have agendas.
    I hope that explains it.

    yonasonw
    Member
    yonasonw
    6 years ago

    News sites today (Real news to all but Trumpist Know Nothings) are reporting widely on the unanimity being shown by just about all hospitals, physicians and insurers in opposition to the GOP bill, opposition because of the huge numbers of people would will lose care under the GOP legislation.

    Either they’re all “snowflakes,” or they know something about the delivery of healthcare.