Anaheim, CA – Bannon Faults George W. Bush For ‘Destructive’ Presidency

    23

    Steve Bannon, a former White House adviser to President Donald Trump, speaks at the California Republican Convention in Anaheim, Calf., on Friday Oct. 20, 2017. (AP Photo/Ringo H.W. Chiu)Anaheim, CA – Former White House adviser Steve Bannon depicted former President George W. Bush as bumbling and inept, faulting him for presiding over a “destructive” presidency during his time in the White House.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Bannon’s scathing remarks on Friday night amounted to a retort to a Bush speech in New York earlier this week, in which the 43rd president denounced bigotry in Trump-era American politics and warned that the rise of “nativism,” isolationism and conspiracy theories have clouded the nation’s true identity.

    But Bannon, speaking to a capacity crowd at a California Republican Party convention, said Bush had embarrassed himself and didn’t know what he was talking about.

    Bannon said Bush has no idea whether “he is coming or going, just like it was when he was president.”

    “There has not been a more destructive presidency than George Bush’s,” Bannon added, as boos could be heard in the crowd at the mention of Bush’s name.

    The remarks came during a speech thick with attacks on the Washington status quo, echoing his call for an “open revolt” against establishment Republicans. He called the “permanent political class” one of the great dangers faced by the country.

    A small group of protesters gathered outside the hotel where Bannon spoke, chanting and waving signs — one displaying a Nazi swastika. The protesters were kept behind steel barricades on a plaza across an entrance road at the hotel, largely out of view of people entering for the event. No arrests were reported.

    Bannon also took aim at the Silicon Valley and its “lords of technology,” predicting that tech leaders and progressives in the state would try to secede from the union in 10 to 15 years. He called the threat to break up the nation a “living problem.”

    He also tried to cheer long-suffering California Republicans, in a state that Trump lost by over 4 million votes and where Republicans have become largely irrelevant in state politics. In Orange County, where the convention was held, several Republican House members are trying to hold onto their seats in districts carried by Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential contest.

    “You’ve got everything you need to win,” he told them.

    He ended his speech with a standing ovation.

    Bannon is promoting a field of primary challengers to take on incumbent Republicans in Congress. But in California, the GOP has been fading for years.

    The state has become a kind of Republican mausoleum: GOP supporters can relive the glory days by visiting the stately presidential libraries of Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon, but today Democrats control every statewide office and rule both chambers of the Legislature by commanding margins.

    Not all Republicans were glad to see Bannon. In a series of tweets last week, former state Assembly Republican leader Chad Mayes said he was shocked by the decision to have the conservative firebrand headline the event.

    “It’s a huge step backward and demonstrates that the party remains tone deaf,” Mayes tweeted.

    California Republicans have bickered for years over what direction to turn — toward the political center or to the right.

    Bannon also argued that the coalition that sent Trump to the White House, including conservatives, Libertarians, populists, economic nationalists, evangelicals, could hold power for decades if they stay unified.

    “If you have the wisdom, the strength, the tenacity, to hold that coalition together, we will govern for 50 to 75 years,” he said.

    Most of the state’s governors in the 20th century were Republicans, and state voters helped elevate a string of GOP presidential candidates to the White House. But the party’s fortunes started to erode in the late 1990s after a series of measures targeting immigrants, which alienated growing segments of the state’s population.

    In 2007, then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger warned party members that the GOP was “dying at the box office” and needed to move to the political center and embrace issues like climate change to appeal to a broader range of voters. In 2011, a state Republican Party committee blocked an attempt by moderates to push the state GOP platform toward the center on immigration, abortion, guns and gay rights.

    The decline continued. Republicans are now a minor party in many California congressional districts, outnumbered by Democrats and independents. Statewide, Democrats count 3.7 million more voters than the GOP.

    Political scientist Jack Pitney, who teaches at Claremont McKenna College, said he doubted the speech would color the 2018 congressional contests, which remain far off for most voters.

    More broadly, he said Bannon’s politics would hurt the GOP, including among affluent, well-educated voters who play an important part in county elections.

    “Inviting him was a moral and political blunder,” Pitney said in an email.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    23 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    PaulinSaudi
    PaulinSaudi
    6 years ago

    Ask Conservatives. Ike was a failure. Nixon, with Wage and Price Controls and the EPA was a failure. Ronald Reagan with his secret wars and support of abortion was a failure. George Bush (the Greater) cut deals with the Democrats and raised taxes, he was a failure. George Bust (the Lesser) was also a failure.
    .

    Maybe the Conservatives elect bad president. Maybe their ideas are so impractical that no president can govern by them.

    6 years ago

    Bush was the most well intended yet the most naive .

    He said tehlim for all USA troops every day and really cared about the Americans . He showed real emotions

    Yet he had this naive belief based on sharansky teachings that if he only offered people democracy they’d em embrace it over tyranny . That’s was his basis for Iraq and for free elections in the Gaza Strip . He failed to understand that Muslims are vilda chayas . Muslims are animals and cannot behave like dignified humans . When you offer animals freedom and democracy they just fight and kill each other and cause lots of destruction along the way . Muslims need to be contained and cannot thrive with freedom and democracy. He caused lots of dangers with that ideology and unleashed the Middle East .

    Ultimately, the ideal would be someone with bushs empathy and morality and trumps street smart no nonsense style would be ideal . I am not sure that mix exists though

    Buchwalter
    Buchwalter
    6 years ago

    Bannon is a fascist and ready to destroy this form of government, Jews lived in peace under fascism and but it will not tolerate a dissenting voice. He is also a nihilist most dangerous of all`

    ayinglefunadorf
    ayinglefunadorf
    6 years ago

    Bush is the worst POTUS ever?. He was the best for the Yiden and for Israel. This Anti-semite Bannon jm”s says Jimmy Carter was better than Bush.

    ayinglefunadorf
    ayinglefunadorf
    6 years ago

    I always believed that Carter was not really bad at all. Bush is the Worst. Now even the Republicans admit it.

    yaakov doe
    Member
    yaakov doe
    6 years ago

    The worst ever is Donald J Trump. He makes even Bush look good, Only the uneducated like Trump.

    6 years ago

    Bush #43 got us into a prolonged, bloody war in Iraq,costing over 7,000 U.S. lives, and thousands of innocent Iraqi lives; even his Father, Bush #41 was against the invasion and war; to this day, Bush won’t admit that he made a mistake.

    6 years ago

    Firstly, Bush use to be the best to israel till trump.

    I am not sure why all you commentators feel because Bush as good to Israel yet flopped on everything else that we can’t criticize him. Yes Bush did some good stuff. He was the worse presdient in terms of understanding muslims though. One has nothing to do with the other.

    I fail to cmoprehend where all this nonsense about Bannon being an anti semite comes from. As I said anti semites don’t hire jews for top positions in their business. The two don’t add up. Stop buying into NPR’s garbage and lies. To them one who is anti LGBT= anti semite. To NPR being jewish is about loving LGBT’s

    6 years ago

    To: #9 - Of course, all of the Republicans sided with Bush, and voted for the invasion of Iraq in 2003. It wasn’t their sons or daughters who were in the invasion, as it was the poor slobs, with less education (as was the case in the war in Vietnam), who did the fighting and the dying.

    #15- The invasion was a mistake. Once Bush saw what a mess Iraq was, he should have gotten out, as his Father did, after the First Gulf War. Instead, he kept our troops there for the remainder of his term, where they were sitting ducks. Even the great M1-5A Abrams tank, was a victim to the savage terrorists, as they would come up behind he tank with their rocket propelled grenades, and disable the tank. To this day, our government has never informed the taxpayers, if that tank was redesigned to stop rocket attacks from the rear.

    All of you who still support the war in Iraq are fools, who never served one day in uniform. War is hell, and it is not as it appears in the movies.