Washington – AP Explains: What Is Net Neutrality And Why Does It Matter?

    9

    FILE - This June 19, 2015, file photo, shows the entrance to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) building in Washington. "Net neutrality" regulations, designed to prevent internet service providers like Verizon, AT&T, Comcast and Charter from favoring some sites and apps over others, are on the chopping block. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)Washington – “Net neutrality” regulations, designed to prevent internet service providers like Verizon, AT&T, Comcast and Charter from favoring some sites and apps over others, are on the chopping block. On Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission plans to vote on a proposal that would not only undo the Obama-era rules that have been in place since 2015, but will forbid states to put anything similar in place.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Here’s a look at what the developments mean for consumers and companies.

    ___

    WHAT IS NET NEUTRALITY?

    Net neutrality is the principle that internet providers treat all web traffic equally, and it’s pretty much how the internet has worked since its creation. But regulators, consumer advocates and internet companies were concerned about what broadband companies could do with their power as the pathway to the internet — blocking or slowing down apps that rival their own services, for example.

    ___

    WHAT DID THE GOVERNMENT DO ABOUT IT?

    The FCC in 2015 approved rules, on a party-line vote, that made sure cable and phone companies don’t manipulate traffic. With them in place, a provider such as Comcast can’t charge Netflix for a faster path to its customers, or block it or slow it down.

    The net neutrality rules gave the FCC power to go after companies for business practices that weren’t explicitly banned as well. For example, the Obama FCC said that “zero rating” practices by AT&T violated net neutrality. The telecom giant exempted its own video app from cellphone data caps, which would save some consumers money, and said video rivals could pay for the same treatment. Under current chairman Ajit Pai, the FCC spiked the effort to go after AT&T, even before it began rolling out a plan to undo the net neutrality rules entirely.

    A federal appeals court upheld the rules in 2016 after broadband providers sued.

    ___

    WHAT TELCOS WANT

    Big telecom companies hate the stricter regulation that comes with the net neutrality rules and have fought them fiercely in court. They say the regulations can undermine investment in broadband and introduced uncertainty about what were acceptable business practices. There were concerns about potential price regulation, even though the FCC had said it won’t set prices for consumer internet service.

    __

    WHAT SILICON VALLEY WANTS

    Internet companies such as Google have strongly backed net neutrality, but many tech firms have been more muted in their activism this year. Netflix, which had been vocal in support of the rules in 2015, said in January that weaker net neutrality wouldn’t hurt it because it’s now too popular with users for broadband providers to interfere.

    __

    WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

    Although the FCC’s two Democrats said they will oppose the proposal, the repeal is likely to prevail as Republicans dominate 3-2. The vote for net neutrality in 2015 was also along party lines, but Democrats dominated then.

    In the long run, net-neutrality advocates say undoing these rules makes it harder for the government to crack down on internet providers who act against consumer interests and will harm innovation. Those who criticize the rules say undoing them is good for investment in broadband networks.

    But advocates aren’t sitting still. Some groups plan lawsuits to challenge the FCC’s move, and Democrats — energized by public protests in support of net neutrality — think it might be a winning political issue for them in 2018 congressional elections.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    9 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    JaredKusherIzSorosPartner
    JaredKusherIzSorosPartner
    6 years ago

    It means that the internet can throttle down access to websites they don’t like.

    For example. The biggest provider is Comcast. They own NBC and MS-NBC. They can/will speed up access to Rachel Maddow and Morning Joe and make Newsmax or Washington Times slow.

    The next biggest provider is Time-Warner. Owned by the Huffington Post people. They can/will speed up to HuffPost and make Drudge Report or Fox News slow.

    Speed up their programs of choice. Chris Hayes. Mika. Chris Matthews.

    The system is now rigged. They can/will slow down Fox, Drudge, Newsmax, The WashTimes and, even, Arutz-7 and VIN.

    hashomer
    hashomer
    6 years ago

    GOP arbitrarily changed this major utility (internet] protocol without AMY comment period-which is illegal. Big corps can now slow down internet service for more money, can censor the internet, can favor one user over another. This will hurt business, and it enraged people under 35. NY AG Schneiderman is going to Court to stop this idiocy.

    lazy-boy
    Active Member
    lazy-boy
    6 years ago

    when you search with Google or Yahoo etc, they are NOT neutral, they give you what they think is important and filter out other sites, so as long as you use a search engine there is no real net neutrality….

    6 years ago

    I wonder if it would now be possible to sue these internet carriers for damages when criminals/terrorists etc. use the internet to plan their crimes. As the ones who (unlike previously) now have freedom to allow or block users, seems to me these carriers must also be held responsible for the consequences.