Albany, NY – In New York, Trump Infrastructure Plan Prompts Questions

    3

    This photo taken on Thursday April 17, 2014, shows ongoing construction of a rail tunnel, left, at the Hudson Yards redevelopment site on Manhattan's west side in New York.  Amtrak is constructing an 800-foot-long concrete box inside the project to preserve space for a tunnel from Newark to New York City that would allow it to double rail capacity across the Hudson River. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)Albany, NY – If President Donald Trump needs help in picking projects for his $1.5 trillion infrastructure program, he needs only to look to his home state of New York, where the list of mega projects needing billions of dollars has been piling up for years.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    It’s unclear however just how much — if any — new money New York can expect for its two most pressing transportation needs. The beleaguered New York City subway system needs extensive upgrades and repairs following decades of underinvestment. And a long-awaited Hudson River rail tunnel to New Jersey, critical for service throughout the Northeast Corridor, will require at least $13 billion.

    Of the $1.5 trillion, Trump’s plan has relatively few new federal dollars — some $200 billion over 10 years. Cities and states that apply for grants could use the money for no more than 20 percent of cost of a project, using local taxes, fees, tolls or private investment to make up the rest.

    “Every federal dollar should be leveraged by partnering with state and local governments and, where appropriate, tapping into private-sector investment,” Trump said during Wednesday’s State of the Union address.

    While that might make sense for smaller projects, transportation experts and state officials say New York doesn’t have the resources to foot most of the bill for projects like the rail tunnel, known as Gateway, a decades-old proposal to relieve congestion and eliminate a chokepoint that is hurting the country’s entire eastern rail corridor.

    The plan offers little help for the city’s subways either.

    “I am, if anything, less optimistic,” said Nick Sifuentes, executive director of Tri-State Transportation Campaign, an organization that advocates for investments in transit in the New York region. “We should be very concerned that the federal government has said ‘we’re not interested in doing real infrastructure development.’ You would think a president from New York would understand the importance.”

    The federal government typically provides 80 percent of the funding for capital expenditures on highways, with state and local governments coming up with the rest. On transit projects, the federal share typically ranges from 50 percent to 80 percent, according to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

    Under Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo, New York has used public-private partnerships to spur big renovations at Kennedy and LaGuardia airports and at Manhattan’s Penn Station. In some cases, private investors get the rights to develop onsite or nearby commercial and retail space in exchange for their investment. In other examples elsewhere in the U.S., private investors financed roads or bridges in exchange for tolls or fees.

    Public-private partnerships could hold promise for the Gateway tunnel project too, according to Chris Roux, a Los Angeles and Washington-D.C.-based attorney and infrastructure financing expert with the firm of Alston and Bird. He said a private group of investors could finance the construction of the tunnel in exchange for a long-term contract to operate and maintain it for several decades. But he cautioned that investors would want a good return.

    “Gateway is so critical, not just for New York but for the whole country,” he said, adding that Trump’s proposal could be the start of a negotiation with states and Congress. “Read his book on how to negotiate. He throws these things out there and you don’t know where it’s going to end up.”

    Under an agreement with then-President Barack Obama, a Democrat, New Jersey and New York agreed to pay for half of the tunnel, with the federal government picking up the rest. But the Trump administration has criticized the project’s cost and, in a letter to the states last December, a top federal transportation official referred to the deal as a “non-existent ‘agreement.'”

    To state officials eager to start the tunnel project, the letter was a stinging disappointment. In a response, state Budget Director Robert Mujica wrote that New York looked forward to the details of Trump’s plan with the hope that “any national program with the ambition to improving our infrastructure must begin with Gateway.”


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    3 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    PaulinSaudi
    PaulinSaudi
    6 years ago

    It has been a year. How much longer do these folks need to get a roads bill done?

    puppydogs
    puppydogs
    6 years ago

    Whatever happened to Obama’s million ready shovel jobs?? I am still waiting.

    6 years ago

    The beleaguered New York City subway system needs extensive upgrades and repairs following decades of underinvestment

    They waste subway money. They spend a fortune on fancy train stations that take years to build and always go over time.

    Every year the MTA kvethcs and raises fairs.

    Then they cry poverty. Stupid govt. And NYC libs are at the forefront of wasteful stupid govt.