Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Washington - Official's Departure Adds To Strain Of Vacancies At Justice

Published on: February 13, 2018 09:35 AM
By: AP
Change text size Text Size  
Attorney General Jeff Sessions waits onstage to address the National Sheriffs' Association Winter Conference on law enforcement efforts to combat the opioid crisis and violent crime, in Washington, Monday, Feb. 12, 2018. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)Attorney General Jeff Sessions waits onstage to address the National Sheriffs' Association Winter Conference on law enforcement efforts to combat the opioid crisis and violent crime, in Washington, Monday, Feb. 12, 2018. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)

Washington - The sudden departure of the Justice Department’s No. 3 official is adding to the turmoil at an agency that already lacks permanent, politically appointed leaders for many of its most important divisions.

Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand’s resignation builds on an unusual problem that has contributed to instability in the department, current and former officials say, and has prevented the Trump administration from fully implementing its agenda more than a year after Attorney General Jeff Sessions took office.

Advertisement:

Sessions lamented situation Monday, blaming a single Republican senator for holding up the confirmations of key figures, including the heads of the department’s national security, criminal and civil rights divisions. While not mentioning him by name, Sessions left no doubt he was referring to Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado, who promised to prevent the confirmation of all Justice Department nominees after Sessions lifted Obama-era protections for states that have legalized marijuana.

Gardner continues to block the confirmations in protest, his spokesman confirmed Monday night.

Some of President Donald Trump’s Justice Department nominees have been in limbo for months as they go through a drawn-out confirmation process that has been aggravated by Gardner’s resistance.

That might be less surprising if Congress were controlled by Democrats. But it’s unusual to see a Republican blocking his own president’s nominee.

“It’s getting frustrating,” Sessions told a friendly crowd at a gathering of the National Sheriff’s Association. “These are critically important components ... and we can’t even get a vote.”

Brand announced Friday she was leaving for a top legal job at Walmart after less than nine months overseeing some of the department’s most politically challenging areas, including its civil rights, antitrust and civil rights divisions. She cited an a opportunity in the private sector she could not turn down, which pays considerably more than a job in government.

But her time at the Justice Department had no doubt been difficult, especially with the staffing shortages. And her tenure came as the institution is under extraordinary criticism from Trump, which has strained morale. Her job also had the prospect of becoming even more difficult because she would have been in line to oversee special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe if Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had resigned, been fired or otherwise stepped aside.

The process to nominate and confirm Brand’s replacement will take months.

Eight key positions lack Senate-confirmed leaders, including four that were overseen by Brand. Also awaiting confirmation is John Demers, Trump’s choice to lead the national security division responsible for terrorism and espionage cases. The post is critical, in part because only officials with Senate approval can sign warrants for foreign surveillance, an essential duty for the head of the national security division.

Twelve of Trump’s 58 U.S. attorney picks still await confirmation, and dozens more have yet to be nominated. Some divisions have seen more than one acting leader in the course of just a few months. They have been briefing Congress and giving news conferences. That can be problematic, said Peter Keisler, who served as acting attorney general under President George W. Bush when Alberto Gonzales resigned from that job.

“The reality is that if someone is perceived as temporary and doesn’t have the full legitimacy that comes with Senate confirmation, they are less able to successfully advocate the interests and positions of their agency to the rest of the government,” Keisler said.

Other impacts of the vacancies are less obvious. Leaders serving in acting capacities are less likely to make wide-reaching policy changes for fear they’ll be overturned once a permanent head is in place. That matters, as Sessions and Trump continue to try to roll out an ambitious agenda that targets urban crime and illegal immigration.

“You can keep the ship steering on the same course it has been on, but it’s really hard to react to emerging problems,” said Joyce Vance, a former U.S. attorney in Alabama who worked under the Obama administration. “There’s a sense that everything is temporary. There’s uncertainty.”



More of today's headlines

Flagstaff, AZ - Six British friends boarded a sightseeing helicopter outside Las Vegas on their way to one of the busiest and noisiest stretches of the Grand Canyon —... Moscow - Human error may be to blame for the crash of a Russian plane that killed 71 people, Russian investigators said Tuesday, noting that the plane's pilots failed...

 

Total6

Read Comments (6)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Feb 13, 2018 at 10:28 AM Anonymous Says:

There is apparent dishonesty here. The ehadline sends the message that DOJ is suffering from under-staffing due to departures, and the initial paragraphs suggest it is Trump's fault. The facts appear later that the nominees are getting stuck in a political quagmire. The blame is typically and unfairly shifted to Trump. But, that's AP for you. Twist anything you can to blame Trump.

2

 Feb 13, 2018 at 11:16 AM Educated Archy Says:

Reply to #1  
Anonymous Says:

There is apparent dishonesty here. The ehadline sends the message that DOJ is suffering from under-staffing due to departures, and the initial paragraphs suggest it is Trump's fault. The facts appear later that the nominees are getting stuck in a political quagmire. The blame is typically and unfairly shifted to Trump. But, that's AP for you. Twist anything you can to blame Trump.

Well stated. Two thumbs up

3

 Feb 13, 2018 at 12:32 PM yonasonw Says:

Reply to #1  
Anonymous Says:

There is apparent dishonesty here. The ehadline sends the message that DOJ is suffering from under-staffing due to departures, and the initial paragraphs suggest it is Trump's fault. The facts appear later that the nominees are getting stuck in a political quagmire. The blame is typically and unfairly shifted to Trump. But, that's AP for you. Twist anything you can to blame Trump.

Would you want to work in the Trump administration?

More than one new account yesterday, reporting on the unprecedented 37% turnover rate among White House staff, quoted a number of Republican professionals who have turned down offers to work for the White House; they cited concerns about being caught up as a witness in the Mueller investigation, about being unexpectedly turned on by a fickle Trump...and that working for the Trump administration might do damage to their careers.

4

 Feb 13, 2018 at 03:45 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #3  
yonasonw Says:

Would you want to work in the Trump administration?

More than one new account yesterday, reporting on the unprecedented 37% turnover rate among White House staff, quoted a number of Republican professionals who have turned down offers to work for the White House; they cited concerns about being caught up as a witness in the Mueller investigation, about being unexpectedly turned on by a fickle Trump...and that working for the Trump administration might do damage to their careers.

You use the turnover rate of staff as a negative. In reality, there is only one White House, and the experiences that people have had elsewhere are less a perfect predictor of how they will succeed and be happy with the job. I view things differently. Those that are unhappy leave, and those that are less than competent are sent away. Obama did not do that. He mastered the skill of the "Peter Principle", where incompetents are never demoted or released. They get to stay and perpetuate negative impact on others. In the case of the White House, the potential target for impact is the entire population.

I'm not sure of your efforts to shoot at Trump, though I am very familiar with the consistency of your efforts to do so, regardless of what happens. It is a clinical obsession.

5

 Feb 13, 2018 at 04:06 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
Anonymous Says:

There is apparent dishonesty here. The ehadline sends the message that DOJ is suffering from under-staffing due to departures, and the initial paragraphs suggest it is Trump's fault. The facts appear later that the nominees are getting stuck in a political quagmire. The blame is typically and unfairly shifted to Trump. But, that's AP for you. Twist anything you can to blame Trump.

Agree totally. Fake news.

6

 Feb 13, 2018 at 04:52 PM Educated Archy Says:

Reply to #3  
yonasonw Says:

Would you want to work in the Trump administration?

More than one new account yesterday, reporting on the unprecedented 37% turnover rate among White House staff, quoted a number of Republican professionals who have turned down offers to work for the White House; they cited concerns about being caught up as a witness in the Mueller investigation, about being unexpectedly turned on by a fickle Trump...and that working for the Trump administration might do damage to their careers.

I'd love to work for Trump.

Most of those that don't want to work are fake career politicians who care to much about being PC

7

Sign-in to post a comment

Click here to sign-in.

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!