Washington – A Border Wall By Any Other Name … Is Steel Slats?

    48

    (Photo: Screen capture of a tweet by President Donald Trump)Washington – The “big beautiful wall” has now become “steel slats.”

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    President Donald Trump is tweaking the words he uses to describe the barrier he’s hoping to build along the U.S.-Mexico border, in part because Democrats appear more amenable to approving money for “fencing” rather than a “wall.”

    As the budget standoff has played out, Trump has adjusted the way he refers to his long-promised wall, which was the centerpiece of his 2016 campaign.

    “The Democrats, are saying loud and clear that they do not want to build a Concrete Wall – but we are not building a Concrete Wall, we are building artistically designed steel slats, so that you can easily see through it,” he tweeted Tuesday.

    During a bill signing Friday, Trump went further, saying he didn’t care what people called it: “One way or the other we’re going to get a wall, we’re going to get a barrier, we’re going to get anything you want to name it. You can name it anything you want.”

    He later praised the House for “approving strong border security and the money necessary to take care of the barrier, wall or steel slats,” adding, “Whatever you want to call it, it’s all the same.”

    That was a far cry from the campaign, when Trump promised to build a “big, beautiful wall” made of concrete, rebar and steel across the length of the southern border. Back then, he lashed out at the suggestion that what he was proposing had anything in common with mere fencing,

    “Jeb Bush just talked about my border proposal to build a “fence.” It’s not a fence, Jeb, it’s a WALL, and there’s a BIG difference!” he tweeted in 2015.

    And just before taking office, Trump corrected a reporter who’d described his plans as such.

    “It’s not a fence, it’s a wall. You just misreported it,” Trump said at a post-election press conference.

    Even before he took office, 654 miles of manmade barrier had been constructed along the border. In the 1990s, Congress provided money under the “Secure Fence Act” and constructed much of what stands today. Many refer to what was built then as “border wall.”

    That changed with Trump, in part because of his specific campaign pledge to build a gleaming, impenetrable “border wall” that Mexico was going to pay for.

    Now, he wants the American public to pay.

    And they have. In budget year 2017, Congress provided $292 million to the Department of Homeland Security to build a steel-bollard wall to replace “ineffective” barriers. More than 31 of 40 miles have been constructed, and nine more are scheduled to be completed by 2019.

    A March funding bill, passed with support from both parties, provided $1.6 billion to build a system that included replacements and new barriers, including levees, steel bollards with narrow spacing between each post and, in some locations, both concrete walls and bollards.

    The lawmakers’ language was notably narrow, limiting the administration to using existing barrier designs instead of the new wall prototypes Trump had built in San Diego near the border.

    That meant Democrats could continue to crow that they’d given Trump no wall money, while Trump claimed he was already well into construction using money that Congress approved for border security.

    “At this moment there is a debate over funding border security and the wall, also called — so that I give them a little bit of an out — ‘steel slats,'” Trump said Thursday. “We don’t use the word ‘wall’ necessarily, but it has to be something special to do the job.”


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    48 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    bsnow
    bsnow
    5 years ago

    Shmukey shumer stop playing politics with american security.

    PaulinSaudi
    PaulinSaudi
    5 years ago

    A wall will not solve a problem that hardly exists. Still, elections have consequences, might as well start work on it where it will do the most good. I see the President has given up on the promise that Mexico will pay for it.

    ayinglefunadorf
    ayinglefunadorf
    5 years ago

    America is secure. The most secure country in the world. Unfortunately the Yiden are not secure under Trump. Say no to the Wall. Never again. Immigrants are helping Yiden. White Supremacist MAGA Americans are killing us. The more Immigrants, the safer we are.(+they clean are toilets and work in the Kitchen in Yeshivot etc) Where Orthodox Jews live live brooklyn, LA, Lakewood etc there are much much more immigrants than in North Dakota etc.

    puppydogs
    puppydogs
    5 years ago

    Cryin chucky, Scandal ridden Obama and bleachbit Hillary were all for the wall until Trump proposed putting up a wall.

    AuthenticSatmar
    AuthenticSatmar
    5 years ago

    A wall will make America more secure. The Democrats under Clinton were the first to suggest it.
    Because Trump calls for it, it suddenly becomes a bad idea?
    Yes, that’s called playing politics.

    qazxc
    qazxc
    5 years ago

    If Trump can pass for a president a fence can pass for a wall.

    puppydogs
    puppydogs
    5 years ago

    Democrats don’t care if we get raped by the illegals. All they care about is votes. The want all these illegals to enter so they can vote democrat.

    puppydogs
    puppydogs
    5 years ago

    Schumer wants the illegals because it will increase our deficit then he can say look how much Trump increased our deficit.

    puppydogs
    puppydogs
    5 years ago

    Love how these libtards are saying we don’t need a wall we don’t need security. Yet they cry that we need protection around our shuls. Which one is it libtards??

    Buchwalter
    Buchwalter
    5 years ago

    You are all; pishers. This country had a father Coughlin loved by
    republicans who thought Jews should be thrown in the river. Then there was another fine specimen named Lindbergh, and I need to mention Hitler’s lawyers John Foster and Allen Dulles