Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Washington - Budget Deal Allows Far Less Money Than Trump Wanted For Wall

Published on: February 12, 2019 07:30 AM
By: AP
Change text size Text Size  
In this Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2019, photo, a new barrier is built along the Texas-Mexico border near downtown El Paso. Such barriers have been a part of El Paso for decades and are currently being expanded, even as the fight over President Donald Trump's desire to wall off the entire U.S.-Mexico border. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)In this Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2019, photo, a new barrier is built along the Texas-Mexico border near downtown El Paso. Such barriers have been a part of El Paso for decades and are currently being expanded, even as the fight over President Donald Trump's desire to wall off the entire U.S.-Mexico border. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

Washington - Congressional negotiators reached agreement to prevent a government shutdown and finance construction of new barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border, overcoming a late-stage hang-up over immigration enforcement issues that had threatened to scuttle the talks.

Advertisement:

Republicans were desperate to avoid another bruising shutdown. They tentatively agreed Monday night to far less money for President Donald Trump’s border wall than the White House’s $5.7 billion wish list, settling for a figure of nearly $1.4 billion, according to congressional aides. The funding measure is through the fiscal year, which ends on Sept. 30.

It’s not clear whether Trump will support the deal, although GOP negotiators said they were hopeful.

The agreement means 55 miles (88 kilometers) of new fencing — constructed through existing designs such as metal slats instead of a concrete wall — but far less than the 215 miles (345 kilometers) the White House demanded in December. The fencing would be built in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas. It actually closely mirrors Trump’s original budget request from last winter, however.

The split-the-differences compromise contains plenty to anger lawmakers on the right and left — too much border fencing than many Democrats would like and too little for conservative Republicans — but its authors praised it as a genuine compromise that would keep the government open and allow everyone to move on.

“With the government being shut down, the specter of another shutdown this close, what brought us back together I thought tonight was we didn’t want that to happen” again, said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala.

Details won’t be officially released until Tuesday, but the pact came in time to alleviate any threat of a second partial government shutdown this weekend. Negotiators said it’s pretty much the deal that Trump could have gotten in December. Aides revealed the details under condition of anonymity because the agreement is tentative.

“Our staffs are just working out the details,” said House Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Nita Lowey, D-N.Y. She said the huge measure — which combines seven spending bills into one — measure would be publicly released as early as Tuesday afternoon.

The pact also includes increases for new technologies such as advanced screening at border entry points, humanitarian aid sought by Democrats, and additional customs officers.

This weekend, Shelby pulled the plug on the talks over Democratic demands to limit immigrant detentions by federal authorities, frustrating some of his fellow negotiators, but Democrats yielded ground on that issue in a fresh round of talks on Monday.

Asked if Trump would back the deal, Shelby said: “We believe from our dealings with them and the latitude they’ve given us, they will support it. We certainly hope so.”

But Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity, a Trump ally, said the barrier money in the agreement was inadequate. He warned late Monday that “any Republican that supports this garbage compromise, you will have to explain.”

“I would hope that Sean Hannity and all the other people you mentioned aren’t running this government. This was a bipartisan deal, Senate and House, Republican and Democrat,” top negotiator Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., said on CNN. “When we sat around the table and negotiated this deal, we didn’t call Sean Hannity, we didn’t call (Ann) Coulter.” Coulter is a conservative commentator.

Trump traveled to El Paso, Texas, for a campaign-style rally Monday night focused on immigration and border issues. He has been adamant that Congress approve money for a wall along the Mexican border, though he no longer repeats his 2016 mantra that Mexico will pay for it, and he took to the stage as lawmakers back in Washington were announcing their breakthrough.

“They said that progress is being made with this committee,” Trump told his audience, referring to the congressional bargainers. “Just so you know, we’re building the wall anyway.”

Democrats carried more leverage into the talks after besting Trump on the 35-day shutdown but showed flexibility in hopes on winning Trump’s signature. After yielding on border barriers, Democrats focused on reducing funding for detention beds to curb what they see as unnecessarily harsh enforcement by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE.

The agreement yielded curbed funding, overall, for ICE detention beds, which Democrats promised would mean the agency would hold fewer detainees than the roughly 49,000 detainees held on Feb. 10, the most recent date for which figures were available. Democrats claimed the number of beds would be ratcheted down to 40,520.

But a proposal to cap at 16,500 the number of detainees caught in areas away from the border — a limit Democrats say was aimed at preventing overreach by the agency — ran into its own Republican wall.

Democrats dropped the demand in the Monday round of talks, and the mood in the Capitol improved markedly.

Trump met Monday afternoon with top advisers in the Oval Office to discuss the negotiations. He softened his rhetoric on the wall but ratcheted it up when alluding to the detention beds issue.

“We can call it anything. We’ll call it barriers, we’ll call it whatever they want,” Trump said. “But now it turns out not only don’t they want to give us money for a wall, they don’t want to give us the space to detain murderers, criminals, drug dealers, human smugglers.”

The recent shutdown left more than 800,000 government workers without paychecks, forced postponement of the State of the Union address and sent Trump’s poll numbers tumbling. As support in his own party began to splinter, Trump surrendered after the shutdown hit 35 days, agreeing to the current temporary reopening without getting money for the wall.

The president’s supporters have suggested that Trump could use executive powers to divert money from the federal budget for wall construction, though he could face challenges in Congress or the courts.

The negotiations hit a rough patch Sunday amid a dispute over curbing ICE, the federal agency that Republicans see as an emblem of tough immigration policies and Democrats accuse of often going too far.

The border debate got most of the attention, but it’s just part of a major spending measure to fund a bevy of Cabinet departments. A collapse of the negotiations would have imperiled another upcoming round of budget talks that are required to prevent steep spending cuts to the Pentagon and domestic agencies.



More of today's headlines

Jerusalem - El Al Israel Airlines said on Tuesday it was continuing to expand into North America with a nonstop flight during the summer months between Tel Aviv and... New York - A much-hyped network upgrade called "5G" means different things to different people. To industry proponents, it's the next huge innovation in wireless...

 

Total20

Read Comments (20)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Feb 12, 2019 at 07:47 AM Educated Archy Says:

5 billion would have only been a down payment and start. So we got a bit less. But we got a wall. That's the bottom line. We got this terrible immoral wall!

I know you guys will blab about how trump said he wants a concrete wall. Phineas will provide us with his words of wisdom. And yes we need to compromise. Yes it's not an ideal wall. But we can proudly say that we are the party of compromise while staying strong to our principal of protecting our border

2

 Feb 12, 2019 at 08:54 AM Sam Says:

Reply to #1  
Educated Archy Says:

5 billion would have only been a down payment and start. So we got a bit less. But we got a wall. That's the bottom line. We got this terrible immoral wall!

I know you guys will blab about how trump said he wants a concrete wall. Phineas will provide us with his words of wisdom. And yes we need to compromise. Yes it's not an ideal wall. But we can proudly say that we are the party of compromise while staying strong to our principal of protecting our border

The wall isn’t immoral. You’re immoral and a fool.

3

 Feb 12, 2019 at 09:09 AM Phineas Says:

If there is 1.4 billion to start, might as well put that money to a wall on a part of the border that is used most frequently

4

 Feb 12, 2019 at 09:12 AM yamsar Says:

Reply to #1  
Educated Archy Says:

5 billion would have only been a down payment and start. So we got a bit less. But we got a wall. That's the bottom line. We got this terrible immoral wall!

I know you guys will blab about how trump said he wants a concrete wall. Phineas will provide us with his words of wisdom. And yes we need to compromise. Yes it's not an ideal wall. But we can proudly say that we are the party of compromise while staying strong to our principal of protecting our border

When you need a 10 foot wide wall to block something off and you only erect a 2 foot wide wall, you got nothing because the breach is still wide open, and the 2 foot wide wall is a waste of money. Face it, Trump won a lot, but this isn’t one of them. He lost on this one. How did your ‘poylishe’ rebbes tell you? “Visch zich inter in gei vater”

5

 Feb 12, 2019 at 09:16 AM alterknaker Says:

Reply to #1  
Educated Archy Says:

5 billion would have only been a down payment and start. So we got a bit less. But we got a wall. That's the bottom line. We got this terrible immoral wall!

I know you guys will blab about how trump said he wants a concrete wall. Phineas will provide us with his words of wisdom. And yes we need to compromise. Yes it's not an ideal wall. But we can proudly say that we are the party of compromise while staying strong to our principal of protecting our border

Yeah, & Mexico paid for it, what else is news?

6

 Feb 12, 2019 at 09:44 AM Phineas Says:

I doubt hannity, Dobbs, rush and coulter agree with you.

7

 Feb 12, 2019 at 10:32 AM rachelw Says:

Reply to #1  
Educated Archy Says:

5 billion would have only been a down payment and start. So we got a bit less. But we got a wall. That's the bottom line. We got this terrible immoral wall!

I know you guys will blab about how trump said he wants a concrete wall. Phineas will provide us with his words of wisdom. And yes we need to compromise. Yes it's not an ideal wall. But we can proudly say that we are the party of compromise while staying strong to our principal of protecting our border

Good post and wow! no spelling mistakes. Except for the word principal - principle is what you’re looking for.

8

 Feb 12, 2019 at 11:34 AM Anonymous Says:

Build it and they won't come.

9

 Feb 12, 2019 at 11:35 AM Anonymous Says:

So Pelosi and Schumer caved again. So much for not giving even a dollar for the wall. MAGA

10

 Feb 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM qazxc Says:

It isn't much of a downpayment, but how much more can we expect from a country as poor as Mexico?

11

 Feb 12, 2019 at 12:37 PM abilenetx Says:

Most likely if you told the people who think USA is a good mark for taking care of them from head to toe, THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH, maybe they would not come. If they realize when they are here and we ask what are you going to do for us rather than what we can do for you, maybe, maybe they will have a second thought.

12

 Feb 12, 2019 at 01:01 PM ayinglefunadorf Says:

Reply to #1  
Educated Archy Says:

5 billion would have only been a down payment and start. So we got a bit less. But we got a wall. That's the bottom line. We got this terrible immoral wall!

I know you guys will blab about how trump said he wants a concrete wall. Phineas will provide us with his words of wisdom. And yes we need to compromise. Yes it's not an ideal wall. But we can proudly say that we are the party of compromise while staying strong to our principal of protecting our border

Sorry, No Wall at all. Its a fence, 20% less than he was offered in Dec. He closed down the Govt. and got less not more. Good job by Pelosi.

13

 Feb 12, 2019 at 01:02 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
Educated Archy Says:

5 billion would have only been a down payment and start. So we got a bit less. But we got a wall. That's the bottom line. We got this terrible immoral wall!

I know you guys will blab about how trump said he wants a concrete wall. Phineas will provide us with his words of wisdom. And yes we need to compromise. Yes it's not an ideal wall. But we can proudly say that we are the party of compromise while staying strong to our principal of protecting our border

" 55 miles of new fencing" Please read before posting Fake News. NO WALL

14

 Feb 12, 2019 at 01:09 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #9  
Anonymous Says:

So Pelosi and Schumer caved again. So much for not giving even a dollar for the wall. MAGA

The border is 3200 miles. In 2 years he got 55 miles or 1.8% worth of FENCE. A (Mechitze) Not a Wall. Art of the Deal. Best negotiator ever. Pelosi/Schumer caved and you are a very stable genious.

15

 Feb 12, 2019 at 01:25 PM Looney Liberals Says:

To all the haters what do you have to say now? I love how toothless Beto was standing last night in front of a BOARDER WALL. Dems are a joke.

16

 Feb 12, 2019 at 01:52 PM alterknaker Says:

Reply to #9  
Anonymous Says:

So Pelosi and Schumer caved again. So much for not giving even a dollar for the wall. MAGA

The Dems funds are only a tiny contribution towards the BIG BEAUTIFUL TREMENDOUS MAGA WALL, the rest will come from Mexico

17

 Feb 12, 2019 at 02:15 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #2  
Sam Says:

The wall isn’t immoral. You’re immoral and a fool.

But Nancy Pelosi said it IS immoral...well actually she only says that about the wall Trump wants to build, but she’s fine with all the other ones!

18

 Feb 12, 2019 at 03:36 PM Educated Archy Says:

Reply to #12  
ayinglefunadorf Says:

Sorry, No Wall at all. Its a fence, 20% less than he was offered in Dec. He closed down the Govt. and got less not more. Good job by Pelosi.

He was going to get 1.6 billion for border security and zero for a wall or fence.
He shut down the govt and got 1.4 for a fence. its a start

19

 Feb 12, 2019 at 04:57 PM Anonymous Says:

Thank you president Trump the market loves it. Your approval ratings are higher than Pelosi, Schumer and the rest of congress. Keep up the good work.

20

 Feb 12, 2019 at 05:16 PM ayinglefunadorf Says:

Reply to #18  
Educated Archy Says:

He was going to get 1.6 billion for border security and zero for a wall or fence.
He shut down the govt and got 1.4 for a fence. its a start

Correct. 1.4 for a fence he could have gotten without the shutdown. A fence is Border Security.

21

Sign-in to post a comment

Click here to sign-in.

Scroll Up
Advertisements:
Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!