New York – Disability Rights Advocates Win Ruling Over Lack Of NYC Subway Elevators

    6

    Commuters take the stairs at L line subway station in New York, U.S. January 14, 2019. REUTERS/Jeenah MoonNew York – New York City’s transit authority violated federal disability law when it replaced a subway station’s stairs without installing an elevator, a federal judge has ruled, a decision that could require new elevators in future station renovations.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The ruling, issued on Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos in Manhattan, came as part of a lawsuit against the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) filed in 2016 by disability rights groups, joined last year by the Justice Department.

    Ramos found that when the MTA renovates a station in a way that affects its usability, such as by replacing stairs, the federal Americans with Disability Act requires it to install an elevator unless it is technically infeasible, regardless of cost.

    Brett Eisenberg, executive director of the disability advocacy group Bronx Independent Living Services, in a statement called the decision “a major victory for all New Yorkers who need elevators to access the subway.” The group was one of the plaintiffs in the case.

    “The MTA is now on notice that whenever it renovates a subway station throughout its system so as to affect the station’s usability, the MTA is obligated to install an elevator, regardless of the cost, unless it is technically infeasible,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said in a statement. “Individuals with disabilities have the same rights to use the New York City subway system as every other person.”

    The MTA could not immediately be reached for comment.

    The lawsuit was filed over the MTA’s $27 million renovation of Middletown Road station on the No. 6 line in the Pelham Bay neighborhood of the Bronx in 2013 and 2014, which did not include installing an elevator so disabled people could use it.

    The MTA argued in court papers that it was entitled not to install an elevator because of high cost.

    Fewer than 25 percent of New York City subway stations have elevators, according to Disability Rights Advocates, a non-profit that provided legal representation for the plaintiffs.

    The system has been plagued by growing delays attributed to such factors as inadequate maintenance, a crumbling infrastructure and outdated signaling, even as ridership has grown. Andy Byford, the current president of the MTA unit that operates the subway, has pledged to improve the system and has said that accessibility will be a top priority.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    6 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    PaulinSaudi
    PaulinSaudi
    5 years ago

    This seems like a very good idea.

    5 years ago

    Requirement to add elevators when renovating REGARDLESS OF COST!!! Why is this so? Is the MTA required to lose money because of this exorbitant cost? The government should share the cost as incentives to increase accessibility to the disabled…just as they have other incentive programs to increase accessibility of disabled!! That would make the cost more reasonable and would not bankrupt the system!!!!

    5 years ago

    Thus is just as important , if not more so , than Trump’s border wall for which he demands assistance from the government!!!

    triumphinwhitehouse
    triumphinwhitehouse
    5 years ago

    I support this, the reason everything by the MTA costs so much is because they hire UNQUALIFIED “minority” contractors who must hire union and have 5 guys watching for 1 working and have constant trainings and union organizing meetings with a janitor making $35 an hour before overtime and there will be overtime since they never get the work done on time.