Washington – Appeals Court: Rabbis Can Keep Their Housing Expenses Tax Free

    2

    Washington – Your rabbi’s housing expenses are still free from the taxman, thanks to a federal appeals court.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The Chicago Court of Appeals on Friday upheld a law that lets rabbis and other clergy receive tax-free housing allowances from the synagogues, churches or mosques that employ them.

    The decision reverses a ruling by the Wisconsin federal district court that found the allowance violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause making it unconstitutional.

    The Freedom from Religion Foundation filed the original lawsuit in 2013, claiming the federal tax code’s “parsonage allowance” violates the Establishment Clause, meaning that the federal government cannot pass laws that aid religion.

    Secular employees receive tax exemptions for housing expenses that are work-related, the appeals court said, and clergy should be treated no different.

    In the United States, 81 percent of full-time senior clergy receive a housing allowance, as do 75 percent of associate clergy, according to the Orthodox Union, which joined with several national Orthodox Jewish organizations in filing a friend-of-the-court brief urging that the allowance be found constitutional.

    The clergy housing allowance “is one of many tax code provisions that subsidizes the housing costs of people who must live in certain geographic locations for the sake of their jobs,” Nathan Diament, the Orthodox Union’s executive director for public policy, said in a statement. “Without this assistance, many synagogues, churches and other houses of worship would not be able to keep their doors open to serve their congregations and their surrounding communities.”


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    2 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Aron1
    Active Member
    Aron1
    5 years ago

    And now a word from our in-house anti-religious brethren (and sistern)…

    5 years ago

    Taxes don’t count, as you have to remove the itemized paletisations from the calculation. If he owned more than one palet (livestock, taxidermy or facsimile of such), which he probably does, the taxes count only in a financial sense and not on an emotional level.