White Plains, NY – Judge Refuses to Dismiss Bronx Synagogue-Bomb Case

    7

    FILE - James Cromitie is the alleged leader of the plot. White Plains, NY – A federal judge has refused to dismiss the criminal case against four men who claimed they were entrapped by a federal informant into a plot to bomb synagogues and shoot down military planes.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Judge Colleen McMahon said precedents establish that even when the government helps commit a crime, others can be prosecuted.

    “In case after case, governmental activity that facilitated the commission of a crime has been held not sufficiently outrageous to warrant dismissal of an indictment,” the judge wrote in a ruling filed Tuesday.

    Defense attorney Vincent Briccetti and the U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment.

    Defendants James Cromitie, 44; Onta Williams, 32; David Williams, 28; and Laguerre Payen, 27, are accused of placing what they thought were bombs outside two Bronx synagogues. The men, all from Newburgh, also are accused of planning to use what they thought was a live Stinger missile against planes at an upstate Air National Guard base.

    They have pleaded not guilty and face up to life in prison if convicted.

    The men’s request for dismissal said that the alleged plot was “a government-inspired creation from day one.” They said an informant chose the targets, offered payment, provided maps and bought the only real weapon involved, a handgun. They alleged “outrageous government conduct.”

    McMahon said the government “does not exactly deny devising and financing the details of the plot.” Prosecutors claimed their agent had to act as if he were taking part “in order to gather evidence of illegal conduct, and perhaps even to prevent some jihadist act from actually taking place.”

    McMahon said she might look at the issue of government misconduct again after the trial. She said if she ruled on “how the scenario took place,” she might be intruding on questions a jury should take up.

    But she expressed doubt that the claim of government misconduct would succeed, even if taken to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    “It seems unlikely that our Court of Appeals would ever find anything short of extreme physical or psychological coercion to be sufficiently outrageous to warrant dismissal of an indictment,” McMahon said.

    McMahon also ruled against motions to dismiss individual counts against the four men.

    Their trial is scheduled for June 14.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    7 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    Unfortunately, even in the Rubashkin case, where the government committed many errors in the raid on Postville and the subsequent prosecution, those errors have not kept the courts from finding him guilty of multiple felonies.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    These guys are definitely anti-semites whose incarceration will only be a benefit for society but in reality, the govt set up this whole thing from scratch. The whole plan from day one came from the informant and he led these guys by their noses every step of the way. It’s really unfair and it would be a travesty of justice of these guys get put away for this.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    Crazy country, they create crimes and then prosecute people.
    All on the taxpayer’s bills! This cost us millions of dollars! In this case
    they will claim its for the sake of the country’s security, but what about
    Dwek’s case? Why did they go on with their grand scheme on that one?
    Who but Dwek benefited from that? What games is the gov’t playing?
    This is becoming a KGB country!

    Logic
    Logic
    13 years ago

    Let’s think about this logically, coercion does exist. If somebody came to you and said here’s a $100 check, please cash it for me, they are coercing you to commit a crime, because they are creating the intent for you to commit the crime. If somebody gives you $100 to assassinate someone, they aren’t coercing you to commit the crime, as you would only commit it if the intent is already there. Once you switch to a blue collar crime class, there is no loop hole of coercion. Plus, I’m sure the gov’t didn’t pick these guys out of a phone book. The proof of the preexisting intent is apparent from the blog they had and from what they wrote on the blog. If convicted, this would be nothing more than constitutional.

    Charlie Hall
    Charlie Hall
    13 years ago

    #2 and #4 ,

    I’m glad you aren’t in charge of counterterrorism for the FBI or the Mossad.