United Nations – NPT Nations: Israel Must Submit to Nuclear Inspection, US Rejects

    21

    United Nations – After 15 years, Arab nations finally won agreement from the United States and the other nuclear powers to take the first step toward banning nuclear weapons from the Middle East. Now the next move is Israel’s.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    But the Israeli government rejected the resolution Saturday, calling it “deeply flawed and hypocritical.”

    Although the U.S. joined the 188 other member nations of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty on Friday in giving a green light to a conference in 2012 “on the establishment of a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction,” senior U.S. officials appeared to backtrack afterward, setting several conditions for the talks to go ahead.

    Taking the toughest line, U.S. National Security Adviser Gen. James Jones said in a statement Friday night that the United States has “serious reservations” about the 2012 conference and believes Mideast peace and full compliance by all countries in the region to their arms control and nonproliferation obligations “are essential precursors” of a WMD-free zone. The compliance demand appeared to be aimed at Iran, which the U.S. believes is pursuing a nuclear weapons program despite Tehran’s claims its only goal is nuclear power.

    Jones also strongly defended longtime U.S. ally Israel, which was singled out for not being a member of the NPT. He said the United States “deplores” the naming of Israel which puts prospects for the 2012 conference “in doubt.” As a co-sponsor of the conference, Jones said the United States will ensure that it will only takes place “if and when all countries feel confident that they can attend.”

    Israel, which has not signed the NPT, said due to the “distorted nature” of the resolution, it would not take part in its implementation.

    “It singles out Israel, the Middle East’s only true democracy and the only country threatened with annihilation. Yet the terrorist regime in Iran, which is racing to develop nuclear weapons and which openly threatens to wipe Israel off the map, is not even mentioned in the resolution,” Israel’s government said in its statement.

    It said the resolution ignores “the real threats” facing the Middle East and “not only fails to advance regional security but actually sets it back.”

    The Arab proposal for a WMD-free zone — to pressure Israel to give up its undeclared arsenal of perhaps 80 nuclear warheads — was endorsed by the 1995 NPT conference but never acted on. At this month’s NPT review, a conference to begin talks on a nuclear-free Mideast was considered by many delegates as “the make-or-break issue,” and agreement on the 2012 meeting was widely welcomed after the 28-page final declaration was approved by consensus.

    But the U.S. reaction raised questions and doubts about whether Israel, Iran and other countries in the Mideast will even hold a meeting in two years.

    Several delegates suggested that earlier comments by U.S. Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher and President Barack Obama’s coordinator for weapons of mass destruction, Gary Samore, warning about the difficulties of holding a conference and persuading Israel to attend may have been sparked by the upcoming visit of Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House on Tuesday.

    Egypt’s U.N. Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz, speaking for the 118-nation Nonaligned Movement of mainly developing countries, said that during the negotiations there was “a little bit of disagreement” on mentioning Israel.

    But he said NAM members thought that since the document issued at the end of the 2000 NPT review conference mentioned the need for Israel to join the treaty and subject its nuclear capabilities to International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards there was “no going back on that commitment” and Israel had to be mentioned in the 2010 document as well.

    Iran had loomed as a potential spoiler that would block consensus at this conference, and Iran and Syria dissented loudly on various points in the final hours, but no objections were raised in the concluding session.

    Facing possible new U.N. sanctions because of its refusal to suspend uranium enrichment and enter negotiations on its nuclear program, the Iranians had sought to turn the spotlight instead on the big nuclear powers, demanding the final document call for speedier disarmament moves.

    Iran’s chief delegate Ali Asghar Soltanieh lamented that the deadline of 2025 sought by NAM for complete disarmament was not included in the final document. Nonetheless, Soltanieh called “the limited measures” in the agreement “a step forward.”

    Jones, the U.S. National Security Adviser, said the failure of the resolution to mention Iran, which he said poses the greatest threat of nuclear proliferation in the region, is “deplorable.”

    Iran’s Soltanieh said the Americans should “think twice” before making such statements. “This was not the right reaction to a positive response, positive measure by our delegation joining the consensus,” he said.

    According to the final document, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the co-sponsors of the 1995 Mideast resolution — the U.S., Russia and Britain — will now appoint a “facilitator” to conduct consultations in preparation for the 2012 conference.

    Jones said the United States “will insist that the conference operate only by consensus by the regional countries.”

    Under the 1970 nonproliferation treaty, nations without nuclear weapons committed not to acquire them; those with them committed to move toward their elimination; and all endorsed everyone’s right to develop peaceful nuclear energy.

    The last NPT conference, in 2005, failed to adopt a consensus declaration. In sharp contrast, a final declaration was not only adopted this year but for the first time it laid out complex action plans for all three of the treaty’s “pillars” — nonproliferation, disarmament and peaceful nuclear energy.

    Under its action plan, the five recognized nuclear-weapon states — the United States, Russia, Britain, France and China — commit to speed up arms reductions, take other steps to diminish the importance of atomic weapons, and report back on progress by 2014. The plan also has 24 steps to promote nonproliferation including making the treaty universal to include Israel, Pakistan India and North Korea, all of which have or are suspected of having nuclear arsenals.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    21 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    Nuclear Deterrence and The Future of the State of Israel:

    I fail to understand Israel’s arrogance in demanding a right to defense through deterrence. It is such an outmoded concept for Israel. During the past several decades, Israel has shown itself completely compliant to ever-increasing demands by others in return for essentially nothing.

    Time was, Arabs who captured a single Jew could expect massive retaliation. We had the miracle at Entebbe, and Israel had resolve, and while hated by its enemies, was at least respected for its will to live. Then, the tables turned. Israel began giving up real, live terrorists, lots of them, for the body of a dead soldier. Israel began apologizing at every turn for any rational demand of a quid pro quo. Israel gave up land, more land, and even more land, for promises. Now we reach Israel giving up strategic territory, like the Golan. Now we reach Israel agreeing to give up half its capital. Now, we reach Israel agreeing not to build housing in Jerusalem in even Jewish areas.

    There’s not much more left to give, and now Israel has the audacity to demand a right of self-defense through nuclear deterrence? Give it up, man. Israelis have long since lost any credibility with their Arab enemies, or with quasi-neutral nations of the world who chuckle every time Israel apologizes for living.

    Give it up. Give up nuclear, and just let yourself be wiped out. You’re just dragging things out now. Put the country to sleep, and I promise we’ll post a memorial plaque in Uganda for you.

    Frustrated
    Frustrated
    13 years ago

    I dont know im sure that if bush would of been president this would not have happenend im sick and tired of this president I think you should impeach him just toss him out like a turkey not even one thing did he “CHANGE” for the good if anything for the bad! We better do something before its to late!

    professor
    professor
    13 years ago

    These organizations are jokes! It’s sad that Israel has to dignify this with a response.

    throw this bum out
    throw this bum out
    13 years ago

    this president is a mindless robot , watch his press confrence and see how dissconected this guy is. he is a popet for a secret kabal, 2012 can not b here soon enugh

    Groiser Chochom
    Groiser Chochom
    13 years ago

    If Israel had the nukes, and was the most reponsible country. What do they want? Look at what happened in Chernobyl. Is anyone suggesting that Russia also commit to those inspections?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    This is not a complicated issue. The State of Israel has 230 nuclear warheads, some of which are fitted for the new fancy submarines they received from Germany, meaning that they intend to use small tactical warheads from the Indian Ocean against Iran. Iran, by contrast, has no nuclear weapons.

    So it certainly makes sense to ask why the State of Israel is supposed to be allowed an exemption under the rules set by international law, and not ONLY in the area of nuclear weapons…….

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    thats the whole plan of this president to leave the jews with nothing to defend itself with and then let his brother have a party. its happening right in front of are eye and we look the other way. why. maybe the summer is coming up and we want to wait till are vacation is over. the timing is no right. israel asked for it sad to say by bowing down again and again .

    The Truth
    The Truth
    13 years ago

    If the US would have built Nuclear Power stations back in the 60s 70s & 80s, there would not be the reliance on Arab oil & the US would not give a hoot about pleasing the Arabs, or care that Israel has nuclear weapons. Now we are left with gas sky high, bending over backwards to please all arabs who want to destroy us and a coast line being destroyed by leaking oil.
    It the US’s own fault & now we pay the price.

    insider
    insider
    13 years ago

    What’s the big deal. Let the cursed Arabs know exactly how powerful the State of Israel really is. Let them also know that the full might and force of Israel will smite them. Let them know that Israel will no longer allow its soveirgnity to be violated. If a bomb is thrown at Israel, a thousand boms will be thrown back. If one soldier is kidnapped, a thousand will be held in the deepest dungeons, without any family access or cell phone communications, until that solitary Israeli soldier is returned. The cursed Arabs loudly declare that they are at war with Israel. Let Israel act accordingly, and Heaven will surely strenghthen and protect its citizens.

    yid
    yid
    13 years ago

    let the goyishe inspectors inn and pay them some porkmeat at any restaurant near the koisel