New York – NY Times Editorial Urges Netanyahu To ‘Stop Playing Games’

    12

    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton (L) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meet in New York, November 11, 2010. REUTERS/Brendan McDermidNew York – Early in his most recent tenure, Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, spent a lot of time trying to persuade President Obama and others that he was serious about making peace with the Palestinians. Only a hard-liner, like him, could pull it off. If only.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    With the peace process crumbling, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton met with Mr. Netanyahu for seven hours on Thursday. She went in insisting that she still believes that Mr. Netanyahu and the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, are “very committed to a two-state solution.” There was no sign of a breakthrough.

    If Mr. Netanyahu is willing to make the hard choices necessary for peace, it’s not evident these days. What is evident is that he has decided that mugging for his hard-line coalition is more important than working with President Obama to craft a peace deal — and counting on his newly empowered Republican allies on Capitol Hill to back him up, no matter what he does.

    Since last week’s American elections, Mr. Netanyahu’s government has published plans for 1,000 new housing units in a contested part of Jerusalem. That same day, on a trip to the United States, Mr. Netanyahu implicitly faulted Mr. Obama for not threatening to attack Iran. “If the international community, led by the United States, hopes to stop Iran’s nuclear program without resorting to military action, it will have to convince Iran that it is prepared to take such action,” he told the Jewish Federations of North America.

    President Obama hasn’t taken anything off the table, while working hard to persuade countries around the world to impose increasingly tough sanctions on Iran. We don’t know if sanctions will ever be enough to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but we know Tehran is feeling the heat. We also know knee-jerk threats about force would rally international sympathy to Iran and strengthen the mullahs’ hands at home.

    What Mr. Netanyahu does not seem to realize is that a peace deal with the Palestinians is not a favor to President Obama. It is vital to Israel’s long-term security. If he squanders this moment, the only ones who can celebrate are the extremists.

    Both Palestinians and Israelis need to do more to salvage the negotiations. Mr. Netanyahu has refused President Obama’s request to extend a moratorium on construction in the Jewish settlements for a modest 60 days. Mr. Abbas has refused to meet until the building stops. Still, we think the burden is on Mr. Netanyahu to get things moving again. Resuming the moratorium will in no way harm Israel’s security or national interest.

    The Obama administration deserves credit for not throwing up its hands. In her marathon session with Mr. Netanyahu, Mrs. Clinton plugged away on a package of generous (overly so, to our minds) incentives and security guarantees that might induce him to revive the moratorium and get back to the bargaining table. She also met with Egypt’s foreign minister to rally more Arab support for the peace process and announced $150 million in additional aid to help the Palestinian Authority build its capability to govern.

    Mr. Netanyahu is to meet with certain members of his cabinet on Saturday and then the full cabinet on Sunday, reportedly to discuss his trip. It’s time for him to stop playing games, reinstate the moratorium, get back to negotiations and engage seriously in a peace deal.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    12 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    13 years ago

    Never did the times criticize Arafat that he should seek to make peace. Apparently its only those right wing dirty jews that they have a problems with. Sorry NY Times. Thank G d Israel doesn’t have to listen to you leftists. You lost bad last week Tuesday. Go back into your holes and support Pelosi

    unbelvbl
    unbelvbl
    13 years ago

    All the news that is fit for the unfit.

    Yaakov2
    Yaakov2
    13 years ago

    Mr. Abbas, who sympathizes with the Palestinian Cold Blooded Murderers and Terrorists, it is Mr.Abbas who is the Stubborn Mule, who refuses to negotiate peace, while Israel as a sovereign country, exercises it’s right to build.

    Mr. Abaas is the one who is refusing the peace negotiations.

    If Mr. Abbas was even the least bit serious about peace he would go to the negotiations table without any pre-conditions.

    The US must increase the pressure on Mr. Abbas for his making unreasonable pre-conditions to the peace negotiations.

    The Arabs are just not interested in peace and Abbas is just looking for excuses to refuse to go to the negotiations table.

    13 years ago

    yeah, but when the arabs release terrorists for what they say is ‘live’ captured soldiers, which turn out to be dead and/ or in other countries, the world is fine with that

    Liepa
    Liepa
    13 years ago

    Did anyone expect anything other than that from a dying paper desperately attempting to remain relevant in todays world. Evey yid that has this garbage home delivered is contributing to their miserable existence. Boycott this poor excuse of a news source.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    BOTH sides needs to begin negotiations with no prior conditions. Everything should be on the table including all territorial issues (except perhaps for a small area of yerushalayim), the scope of a new Palestinan state’s sovereignty including having its own army, representation in the U.N., access to religious sites that are holy to both religion

    Peter
    Peter
    13 years ago

    The Times is so biased against Israel that it’s lost all credibility. What I don’t understand is why Jewish businesses still advertise in it. Jews should boycott the Times by not advertising in or subscribing to it. It’s time for the Times to bite the dust.

    LiberalismIsADisease
    LiberalismIsADisease
    13 years ago

    No stupid slimes! Natanyahu understands that you need 2 parties to make a real peace and the arabs yemach sh’mom are nowhere to be seen! You morons at the NY Slimes have done what you can, as the voice of socialism and the liberal democrats to put Obama on a pedestal as opposed to the top of the presidential dung heap. Natanyahu doesnt have to help.

    Mr_Leslie
    Mr_Leslie
    13 years ago

    Since when has Israel stopped being an independent country? It certainly is not the 51st American state.

    Joe-Shmoe
    Joe-Shmoe
    13 years ago

    I love the way mr ny slimes knows everything soooo well! Lets go to israel! where at the narrowest part is only 6 miles wide! imagine a fighter jet going at 500 mph, (or how ever slow) how long should take to pass! He’s concerned about Israels safety and security! how funny. the only way this makes sense is if this editor is interested in israels demise rather than their security!