London – Breast Cancer Risk Rises with 2nd Hand Smoke

    5

    London – Smokers and women who quit up to 20 years previously are more at risk of the disease compared to other postmenopausal women who have never smoked or have never been around second-hand smoke, researchers said in Wednesday’s issue of the British Medical Journal.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Prof. Juhua Luo of the department of community medicine at West Virginia University and her co-authors looked for confirmed cases of invasive breast cancer among nearly 80,000 American women 50 to 79 years old who entered the study between 1993 and 1998.

    Over an average followup of 10 years, 3,520 cases of breast cancer were found in the Women’s Health Initiative study, which is funded by the U.S. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.

    Current smokers had 1.16 times the breast cancer risk compared to women who never smoked, the team found. Breast cancer risk was raised by 1.09 times among former smokers after menopause. Twenty years after butting out, the risk appeared drop off.

    Breast cancer risk in a new study in the British Medical Journal rose the more women smoked and the longer they did so, researchers found. (Francois Mori/Associated Press)

    “We were able to see the risk elevated in women who smoked as few as five to 15 cigarettes per day; but the more women smoked and the longer women smoked, the higher the risks, and it’s really pretty consistent,” said study co-author Dr. Karen Margolis, senior clinical investigator with HealthPartners Research Foundation in Minneapolis.

    The link between increased risk of breast cancer and second-hand smoke was only found for extensive exposure — more than 10 years recalled during childhood, more than 20 years at home as an adult and more than a decade at work.

    Read more at CBC News


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    5 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    geshmak2
    geshmak2
    13 years ago

    and what’s about men?

    bobgrant
    bobgrant
    13 years ago

    It look like man r free

    Raphael_Kaufman
    Raphael_Kaufman
    13 years ago

    1.16? 1.09? Doesn’t anyone take Statistics 101 any more? The numbers listed as increased risk do not approach any value that is statistically significant. It would take a correlation of more than twice the incidence to begin to be significant. A 1.16 times increase and a 1.09 times increase is statistically the same as no correlation.