New York, NY – Bloomberg Plans $3B Transformation of Waterfront

    14

    FILE - In this file photo of Aug. 27, 2008, an oil tanker makes its way through New York Harbor past the Manhattan skyline. The city’s first waterfront plan in two decades is to be announced Monday, March 14, 2011. The blueprint is New York's attempt to reverse more than a century of planning that left much of the city’s 520 miles of shoreline inaccessible to residents and instead directed them inland for their recreation and relaxation. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, file)New York, NY – For decades, development in New York was about concrete, skyscrapers and roads — highways that often ringed the city and kept people from the hundreds of miles of waterfront shoreline that help define the city. Now, the city’s first waterfront plan in two decades will spend billions of dollars to reunite New Yorkers with their water.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The $3 billion-plus plan, to be announced by the Bloomberg administration Monday, would add 50 new acres of parks, expand dozens more, overhaul the city’s sewage system to reduce waste pushed into the rivers and dredge waterways to make room for giants ships that are rarely seen on the East Coast.

    The blueprint is New York City’s attempt to reverse more than a century of planning that left much of the city’s 520 miles of shoreline inaccessible to residents and instead directed them inland for their recreation and relaxation.

    “New York City has more miles of waterfront than Seattle, San Francisco, Chicago, and Portland combined — but for decades, too many neighborhoods have been blocked off from it,” Mayor Michael Bloomberg said in a statement. “Our waterfront and waterways — what we are calling New York City’s sixth borough — are invaluable assets, and when our work is complete, New York City will again be known as one of the world’s premier waterfront cities.”

    For much of the city’s history, the waterfront was viewed more as dumping ground than destination. The Erie Canal’s opening in the early 1800s made the city America’s main port, and industrial toxins and human waste turned much of New York Harbor to muck. The harbor’s oysters died, methane gas bubbled to the surface, and the horrific smell wafted inland and kept the city’s upper class far from the water.

    The city’s inland orientation never changed. And in the mid-20th century, when Robert Moses was looking for a place to build Manhattan’s highways, he chose the island’s coasts — cutting the borough’s pedestrians off from the water.

    The first stages of the effort are expected to cost the city more than $3.27 billion over the next three years, with most of the money going to wastewater infrastructure. The work is meant to create 13,000 construction jobs and 3,400 permanent maritime positions. The longer-term components of the plan have no price tag yet, and their outcome will depend on the approach of future administrations.

    Waterside green space would expand in all five boroughs over the next three years. The city anticipates spending $40 million to buy and develop more than 50 acres of waterfront parks, and paying another $200 million to expand and improve existing shoreside parkland. Another $120 million would fund esplanades and biking paths along the water. The boroughs would be ringed by a network of boat landings and canoe launches, allowing people not only to view the water, but to get in it.

    The city plans to continue previously announced plans to expand East River ferry service between neighborhoods in Manhattan, Brooklyn and Queens, possibly allowing passengers to use the same MetroCards used on the subways to get home.

    Water-quality projects costing $2.57 billion over three years would be funded with city water utility payments. Wastewater treatment plant improvements would cost $1.6 billion, and the city plans to pay $650 million more to improve sewer-system pipe capacity. Another $180 million would go to install rooftop gardens and permeable landscaping that would keep more rainwater out of the sewage system.

    The remaining funding for the first three years, more than $700 million, would come from the city’s capital budget. The mayor’s office says that money has already been set aside for the projects, and that spending cuts of 4 percent in most agencies and thousands of planned teacher layoffs won’t slow the effort.

    The plan also calls for dredging some parts of the harbor to make way for the giant container ships that are expected to make their way up the East Coast after the expansion of the Panama Canal is completed, spending more than $200 million on maritime industry initiatives and ecological restoration.

    The city says the blueprint marks the first time New York has issued a plan for the use of the waterways themselves, rather than just the shoreline. The city’s last waterfront plan, completed in 1992, called for a new kind of zoning along the city’s shoreline, to allow planners to develop the waterfront separately from bordering neighborhoods.

    A waterfront advocate called the city’s new waterfront “a holistic plan, a balanced plan.”

    Roland Lewis, president of the Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance, a coalition of environmental, recreational and business organizations, said the plan “will increase the attention and use of the waterfront tremendously, from greenways, to boat access, to cleaner water, to preservation and cultivation of maritime industry and the working waterfront.”


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    14 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    mewhoze
    mewhoze
    13 years ago

    now this is just great, we dont have money for firemen or policemen or feeding our senior citizens, but we have billions to develop the waterfront.
    shows you what priorities are.

    meshigener
    meshigener
    13 years ago

    Is our Mayor on a different planet?
    From where did he find $3b to spend? He is cutting everything from education to senior centers and he has $3b for parks? Is he nuts?
    Will these parks have bike lanes?

    Mayor its time for you take a hike in a park and give someone else to run this City.

    chayamom
    chayamom
    13 years ago

    is there anyone normal in politics today??? one by one it seems as if they have all lost their minds!!

    13 years ago

    This sounds like a wonderful idea — in a time of prosperity. Make your plans Mr. Mayor but will you please wait until the citizens of NYC can afford it?

    amicable
    amicable
    13 years ago

    I applaud the Mayor’s decision to revitalize the waterfront. The cost to revitalize is but a drop in the bucked compared to the revenue this will generate.

    The increase (in the BILLIONS) of the value of the neighboring real estate will mean more construction, more tax dollars, more jobs, etc. Not to mention more tourists, more demand for hotels (hotel construction etc)

    The ripple effect will be enormous. This will be Mayor Mike’s legacy of turning the downtrodden waterfront into NYC’s “gold coast”

    I hope he includes all the waterfronts such as the Newtown Creek, the greenpoint waterfronts, all the industrial waterfronts in williamsburg etc, not just the big waterfronts like what happened to the west side highway waterfront.

    mewhoze
    mewhoze
    13 years ago

    #7 , do you work for him?
    sounds that way.

    13 years ago

    why did he spend city resources to plan (or dream) about this great idea that will NEVER happen?
    He’s out of his mind….

    13 years ago

    If this generates jobs, then please go ahead…

    13 years ago

    I’m all for spending a reasonable amount of money on PUBLIC parkland. Unfortunately, if our tax dollars are being used to create pseudo-public parkland to adorn the glut of high rises already built/being built with more of our tax dollars (tax breaks galore), then I cry FOUL! What is occurring here is a simple case of “selective” lack of funds, i.e. no money for the fire department, police, and schools, but yes money for tax breaks and bigwig developers.

    Butterfly
    Butterfly
    13 years ago

    Are we using monopoly money for this project or is Mayor Bloomberg “contributing” this to the CITY?? Thank You Very Much Mr. Mayor!!