New York – Op-Ed: Don’t Call Me Orthodox When A Crime Is Committed

    38

    New York – Years ago, when I served as a chaplain at a large Chicago hospital, I would often be asked by patients, “What kind of rabbi are you?” Knowing that this was a loaded question – the answer to which would almost certainly limit my ability to serve all those in need of pastoral care – I would simply reply, “I’m a Jewish rabbi!” It served me well, and considering what has been happening out there lately in the Jewish world, it is an appellation I may again wish to employ.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    It began earlier this summer with the tragic death of Leiby Kletzky, the eightyear- old hassidic boy brutally murdered in Brooklyn’s Borough Park. The press reports screamed that his killer, Levi Aron, was an “Orthodox Jew.” Excuse me? An “Orthodox” Jew?! Can we really say that a monster who kidnaps, strangles and dismembers a young child – stuffing his body parts in a garbage dumpster and a freezer – is “Orthodox”? And then the murder two weeks later of Rabbi Elazar Abuhatzeira of Beersheba, grandson of the mystic Baba Sali.

    The murderer, Asher Dahan, was described in the news accounts as a “religious” Jew. “Religious”?! Are you serious? Do you mean to say that you can stab a defenseless person six times and still be deemed “religious”? Just a few days later came word that a “cult of polygamous Breslav Hassidim” had been arrested in Jerusalem. Three men were taken into custody and their six wives and 15 children placed in separate shelters across the country. The men were indicted on a variety of charges that included enslavement, physical and sexual abuse of their multiple spouses and children, and extreme acts of violence. Among the items found in the cult’s headquarters were stun guns, electric cables and wooden rods.

    Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the term hassid literally mean “one who practices acts of kindness” – hessed – and refer generally to those pious individuals who follow a particular rabbinic leader or dynasty? Just what “acts of kindness” were these perverse perpetrators pursuing? And which “rabbinic masters” served as their inspiration? Word to the villains of the vocabulary and the legislators of the lexicon: It’s time to clean up the terminology.

    WHAT, EXACTLY, defines a Jew as Orthodox, hassidic or religious? If one eats a cheeseburger on Yom Kippur, or publicly smokes outside the shul on Shabbat, he is secular and irreligious; yet if he observes ritual practices but murders a child or abuses several wives, he still remains within the observant fold? When does one actually cross the line from frum to frei? What crimes does one have to have to commit before he is deemed to be “non-Orthodox”? CONVERSELY, AND perhaps even more importantly, what acts of societal or spiritual goodness qualify someone as a man or woman of faith? If a soldier puts his life on the line in defense of the people of Israel, is he not beloved of God? If a person conducts his business affairs with honesty – which, according to the Talmud, is the first question one is asked in Heaven – is he not righteous? And if an individual volunteers weekly at a soup kitchen and greets all those around him cheerfully and graciously, is he not a “hassid,” emulating the Almighty’s virtue of loving-kindness? Who among us owns a “theological Geiger counter” that can measure spiritual worth? Labels, as we all know, are much better suited to pants than people. Labels serve mainly to divide us, to brand and constrict us, as if we human beings can be neatly classified and defined in just a word or two. The fact is, we are complex creations that defy short and simple characterization. Scratch the surface of a Jew – any Jew – and you will discover not only a touch of the Divine but, as the rabbis say, a world in and of itself.

    Part of our problem, I suggest, is an almost obsessive fixation on the outer trappings of apparel and appearance. We judge others instantly by the clothes they don, the styles they employ, the costumes they wear. Clothes are indeed important guardians of modesty, but they do not necessarily connote religiosity.

    Aron sported a beard and black kippa; Dahan – who carried his murder weapon in his tefillin bag – wore a black suit and black hat; the boys of Breslav had side-curls and large white kippot.

    Beware instant identification via dress code; it may have little or nothing to do with the kind of people we really are.

    It is, rather, the actions, deeds and moral behavior we exhibit that are the real yardsticks of spiritual excellence.

    My Bubbie of sainted memory used to sum it up with the perfect Yiddish phrase: A galach ken zein frum; uber a yid darf zein ehrlich – clergy of any denomination can be religious, but a Jew must aspire to be a person of integrity.

    If there is anything that I think I know about God, it is that He has total x-ray vision. He sees right through the clothes, as if they are not there at all, as if He is looking at Adam, the first, unclothed man. As He told the Prophet Samuel in so many words, God sees not the hat, but the heart; not the suit, but the soul. Second-guessing God is a dangerous and generally fruitless enterprise, for God has His own criteria for quality, and His choices for Jewish leadership – from the outcast, maligned young David to the unaffiliated, assimilated Herzl – confuse and confound us. In fact, true faith may more readily be generated when we accord everyone, including and especially those from whom we differ, the status of “holy,” created in God’s image.

    The hassidic master Levi Yitzhak of Berditchev was an advocate par excellence for the general Jewish public, regardless of their level of observance.

    He would often say, “The Almighty gave us a mouth for two purposes: to pronounce prayers and verses, and to find merit for each and every Jew.”

    In this season of approaching the High Holy Days – we have now begun the month of Elul, the traditional “training ground” for the Days of Awe – we would do well to understand that finding merit in others is the surest way of finding it in ourselves.

    The writer is director of the Jewish Outreach Center of Ra’anana.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    38 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    The_Truth
    Noble Member
    The_Truth
    12 years ago

    Great piece.
    I have asked myself the question before: what defines someone as frum / religious / chareid?
    Its all about putting people in boxes and trying to categorize everyone else by our own standards – which never works. Only Hashem can be the True Judge.

    ComeOn
    ComeOn
    12 years ago

    As much as I agree with this piece, it is not practical to call these murderers, “Up Until Recently Orthodox, Jewish Murderer” The facts are that until they committed the crime, they were clearly Orthodox. The whole sensationalism of the story stems from the fact that they came from such an upstanding community.

    Materetsky
    Materetsky
    12 years ago

    I’ve been told that Orthodox = shomer shabbos, shomer kashrus, and taharas mishpacha. That doesn’t mean frum or good Jew or anything else it just means Orthodox. (According to my rav)

    shvigger
    shvigger
    12 years ago

    The problem characters he mentions would be baalei teshuva who have never assimilated into broader Jewish society. How he mentions David Hamelech and Hertzl Ym”sh is beyond reprehensible.

    shtill
    shtill
    12 years ago

    Waste of time. All it means is the culture and society the criminal comes from. It helps clarify that people of all pursuasions are capable of the worst. Sorry Rabbi.

    mbaumgarten
    mbaumgarten
    12 years ago

    Of course it is appropriate for the media to refer to persons, who dress like Orthodox Jews and engage in certain external practices that are peculiar to Orthodox Jews, as Orthodox Jews, even when they have committed horrific crimes. Do you have a similar beef with members of the media for referring to the 9-11 terrorists as “Muslim” terrorists? I didn’t think so.

    12 years ago

    To compare Mr. S. M. Rubashkin to the other individuals mentioned in this article is totally without merit and not correct. Rubashkin did not lie in court. He was acquited in state court on immigration charges. In federal court he was convicted (within a questionable context) of financial violations. As to the article, yes, if one claims (by dress or otherwise) to be a religious (or Orthodox) Jew one must act according to a high standard of personal conduct and behave in public in a manner that (in both cases) is set out by the Torah.

    FredE
    FredE
    12 years ago

    The problem I have with this argument is that it confuses things. Surely Rabbi Weiss would agree thats its better for a given individual to be shomer shabbos then not to be, or for a given individual to keep kosher then not to. It also can be used to justify all kinds of issurim, as in “I may not keep kosher but I didnt kill anybody — therefore I can eat what I want”. Try using that with a secular judge “Hey, I may not obey the speeding laws, but I didnt kill anybody!” — you’d be laughed at.

    Member
    12 years ago

    This was a good article.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    12 years ago

    Yidden are required always to act in accordance with the highest ethical and moral standards, especially in the context of actions that would create a chillul hashem when they violate dina d’malchusa. In the beis din shel maalah, there are no subtle shades of difference depending on what portion of the federal or state penal code was violated. Whether it be SMR or Aron, all such illegal acts are a disgrace to yiddeshkeit and need to be judged harshly.

    LoveHashem
    LoveHashem
    12 years ago

    What’s so impossible about being Orthodox and committing awful deeds? Hashem gives us free will & a -Yetzer Hara. And in the case of all the above-mentioned individuals, each was very mentally ill. can’t crazy people consider themselves orthodox?

    PMOinFL
    PMOinFL
    12 years ago

    This article should make us all think a bit more about who we are.

    I work with a man who is a Pakistani Muslim. He is one of the kindest men I’ve ever known. We work in a high stress job where patient care is often at stake. Every time I have a conflict between work and Shabbos or Yom Tov, he is the first to sacrifice his family time to cover for me. When there are functions at work, he is the only one who remembers to order food for me from a kosher establishment. Even the Jews I work with don’t care like that.

    After 9/11, people in the office were suspicious of him (and other Muslims) and they would say terrible things behind my friend’s back. It killed me. His wife, a nurse, would frequently visit him at work. She always wore a hijab (a cover for her hair and neck). While she still dresses very modestly, she no longer covers her hair, and he now skips his afternoon prayers. He said it is easier to convince people we are “good ones” if we appear more like atheists.

    Levi Aron looks like us. Every bad act allows hateful bigots to judge us on looks alone. We have a concept of Chillul H” for that reason.

    Thanks for giving me something to talk to my family about this Shabbos.

    12 years ago

    What a wonderfful article. We Jews have appended adjectives such as Chassidishe, Litvishe, Satmar and Conservative on ourselves and dress accordingly and daven accordingly. According to the author, to Hashem, we are all Yidden – with “a touch of the divine”. How right he is – we spend far too much time arguing with each other over minutae instead of being united as Klal Yisroel. Could this be one of the reasons that we are still awaiting Moshiach?

    amicable
    amicable
    12 years ago

    Firstly, why do you assume levi is guilty?

    If he was insane, then why can’t he be labeled orthodox?

    Second, orthodox is a frame of mind, and not necessarily practicing orthodox. It is simply what he believes not necessarily that he practices it like a saint.

    The-Macher
    The-Macher
    12 years ago

    The fact that the author lives in EY and calls himself Stewart speaks volumes for where he is. Kshoit atzmecho…(and all of the examples he brings are unbalanced meshuggeners). Herzl, on the other hand, in the same sentence as Dovid haMelech? Sorry, Stew. Your cholent is rancid.

    12 years ago

    For whom was the Toirah given? For the gentiles? True our viddui doesn’t exactly say ‘rotzachnu’, but it also doesn’t mention ribbis (interest) and many other common aveyros. Sadly, an otherwise orthodox person can commit the worst aveyros – that is what teshuvah, as well as all the capital and corporal punishments of the Toirah, are about.

    Berl
    Berl
    12 years ago

    excellent, an aveirah is an aveirah and murder, stealing, abuse are all on the same level as desecrating shabbos. So once a person crosses the line, he loses the right to be called frum, religious, orthodox!

    Menachem0110
    Menachem0110
    12 years ago

    I disagree with the premise of the article. Yes, a murderer is not “orthodox” by definition, and a deviant is not a “hasid” by strict definition. But in reality we know what those terms refer too. I always marvel at the twisted logic you hear from Muslims that terrorists are not “real” Muslims, as true Islam does allow it, blah blah blah. Let’s not hide behind that same flawed “play one words” contortion-isms…