Washington – Lawmaker’s Sign Cracks Decorum at Obama Job Speech

    9

    Rep. Jeff Landry, R-La., holds a sign during a speech by President Barack Obama to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 8, 2011.  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)Washington – Rep. Jeff Landry knew not to yell at President Barack Obama during his jobs address Thursday night to Congress. That move made Rep. Joe Wilson famous a couple of years ago, and not necessarily for the better. Instead, Republican leaders urged their members to show up, keep an open mind and be polite — voters were anxious and Congress’ bickering had angered large majorities of them.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    So Landry, R-La., instead printed out a small white sign to raise when Obama mentioned how, exactly, he planned to put more Americans to work.

    “Drilling(equals)jobs,” it read in big black letters. Seated two rows behind the well-mannered Wilson, R-S.C., Landry held it up when Obama acknowledged that Republicans might have ideas different from his $447 billion jobs package.

    It was only a modest departure from decorum, but a sure signal that more than policy disagreements remain between Obama and congressional Republicans whose standoff over raising the debt ceiling last month brought the country to the brink of default. The markets and recession-weary Americans didn’t appreciate the suspense. The nation’s credit rating suffered for the bickering, and Congress’ favorable ratings dropped to around 12 percent.

    Aware that some conservatives planned to boycott Thursday’s speech, Republican leaders urged lawmakers returning to Washington this week to be cool. They said that they were listening for ideas they could agree upon to put some of the 14 million unemployed Americans back to work. And they declined to issue a formal, televised response.

    Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, a Republican presidential candidate, didn’t make it to the speech, blaming floods in in the rain-ravaged capital. But she did arrive in time to hold her own news conference afterward, where she cast the president’s speech as misguided and political.

    “Our patience for speeches, gimmicks and excuses has run out,” she said.

    In the House chamber earlier in the evening, there was little joy in the face-to-face meeting between Obama and lawmakers. The White House and House Republicans had sparred even over the date of the address: Obama had proposed Wednesday, at the exact time of the Republican presidential candidates’ televised debate in California. House Speaker John Boehner proposed Thursday instead. The two agreed on 7 p.m., more than an hour before the kickoff of the National Football League season.

    “I’ve encouraged my colleagues to come tonight and to listen to the president,” Boehner said Thursday morning. “We ought to be respectful, and we ought to welcome him.”

    In the evening, the speaker and the president greeted each other respectfully.

    Democrats smarting from Obama’s recent criticisms of Congress were stingy with the whoops, hollers and sustained standing ovations that peppered Obama’s previous addresses to Congress.

    Republicans openly chuckled when Obama insisted that his plan to tax rich people more “isn’t political grandstanding.”

    Some Republican lawmakers skipped the speech entirely, making it clear to reporters they felt they had more important business to attend.

    Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga., tweeted a live town hall from his office, said his spokeswoman, Meredith Griffanti. And Rep. Joe Walsh, R-Ill., was home in the Chicago suburbs hosting a meeting with small business owners. South Carolina Republican Sen. Jim DeMint, who calls himself “Sen. Tea Party,” had planned to skip town before the speech, citing a meeting in Charleston, S.C., with officials and employees of the Boeing Co. Sen. David Vitter, R-La., planned to listen carefully from home, where he wanted to watch the New Orleans Saints play the Green Bay Packers.

    But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., scheduled a vote Thursday night immediately after Obama’s speech that kept DeMint, Vitter and the rest of the Senate in Washington.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    9 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    SherryTheNoahide
    SherryTheNoahide
    12 years ago

    “Sen. David Vitter, R-La., planned to listen carefully from home, where he wanted to watch the New Orleans Saints play the Green Bay Packers.”

    This man should be fired. Period. With 14+ million of Americans out of jobs, and the President makes a huge jobs speech to both sessions of Congress…and you choose to waste your time on nonsense & football?! Aside from the man’s “personal issues” (I think we all remember how much trouble he got himself into w\his wife a few years back), it’s stuff like THIS that has given Congress it’s lowest approval ratings in this country’s history!

    Can you imagine what would happen to ANY of us in this forum, if we simply just “chose” not to show up to work for an important meeting, because we wanted to attend a football game?!

    Every one of us would be fired immediately… but he gets to keep his job! WHY?! Because he’s a politician, and so “doing nothing” and not bothering to show up to work is considered “taking a stand” I guess! *hmph*

    And this kind of nonsense my friends, is EXACTLY why Barack Obama will win re-election in 2012, whether any of you like it or not.

    People still like HIM, more than they like the obstructionists in Congress.

    chachom
    chachom
    12 years ago

    Do the math. 447 billion divided by 14 million is 31,928 per job created. And believe me this job bill won’t get everyone back working.

    PMOinFL
    PMOinFL
    12 years ago

    Drilling = NOTHING

    There are MILLIONS of acres already approved and permitted and nobody is drilling anything.

    The only people babbling on and on about drilling are the politicians. You never hear the OIL companies asking for drilling permits. They aren’t even drilling the ones they have already been granted!

    The problem with drilling is not a lack of permits. The problem with drilling in America is that it is too expensive (mostly labor) to pull oil out of the ground. It is much cheaper to be in a place where you can employ foreigners at $10/day.

    “Drill baby drill” may have been a great soundbite to draw in the ignorant masses who were desperate for “slogan” I suppose, but the argument has never really held up. It is just used for political posturing and punditry,

    Mr. Landry is just further evidence that my once beloved Republican Party is nothing more than a shell of its former self. The party is filled with pompous fools who love media attention and feeding their egos more than they’ll ever love this country.

    We need to start electing folks who love their country and will do whatever it takes to see her succeed, regardless of party dogma.

    We need REAL Conservatives NOW!

    my4amos
    my4amos
    12 years ago

    Rep. Jeff Landry, R-La., hah? I confess I’ve never heard of him, but is it too late for him to run for the nomination? Run, Jeff, run!