United Nations – Palestinians Say They May Have No Choice But To Take Israel To Hague Court

    10

    FILE - The entrance of the International Criminal Court (ICC) is seen in The Hague March 3, 2011.  ReutersUnited Nations – The Palestinians declared Wednesday that they will have no choice but to complain about Israel to the International Criminal Court if the Jewish state proceeds with plans to build housing on land the Palestinians want for a future state.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Speaking to reporters after a meeting of the U.N. Security Council on the Middle East, Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki said his government’s decision will largely depend on what the Israelis do with the so-called “E1” area outside the Arab suburbs of East Jerusalem.

    “If Israel would like to go further by implementing the E1 (settlement) plan and the other related plans around Jerusalem then yes, we will be going to the ICC,” he said. “We have no other choice. It depends on the Israeli decision.”

    The Palestinians have previously suggested that bringing their various disputes with Israel to the Hague-based court was an option, but Malki’s remarks on Wednesday were the most direct threat his government has made against the Jewish state to date.

    The International Criminal Court prosecutes charges of genocide, war crimes and other major human rights violations. The Palestinians must first apply to join the court, and once a member they could refer Israel for investigation.

    The Palestinians became eligible to join the ICC after the U.N. General Assembly upgraded the Palestinians’ status at the world body in November from “observer entity” to “non-member state,” a move that was widely seen as a de facto recognition of an independent Palestinian state.

    After the November 29 vote – on the 65th anniversary of the adoption of U.N. resolution 181 that partitioned Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states – Israel announced it would build 3,000 more settler homes in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which are areas the Palestinians want for a future state, along with Gaza.

    E1 covers some 12 square km (4.6 square miles) and is considered particularly important because it not only juts into the narrow “waist” of the West Bank, but also backs onto East Jerusalem, where Palestinians want to establish their capital.

    Approximately 500,000 Israelis and 2.5 million Palestinians live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The United Nations deems all Israeli settlements in the West Bank to be illegal.

    ‘STATE OF PALESTINE’

    U.N. Special Coordinator of the Middle East Peace Process Robert Serry, told the 15-nation Security Council settlements were contrary to international law and “increasingly an obstacle to peace.” But he also warned the Palestinians against pursuing international action.

    The council meeting on the Middle East represented its first public debate on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since the Palestinian U.N. status upgrade. Malki and a number of council members referred to the “State of Palestine” in their speeches.

    The words “State of Palestine” were also emblazoned on the name plate for the Palestinian delegation.

    U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice made clear to the council that such public references to the “State of Palestine” do not make it a sovereign state.

    “Any reference to the ‘State of Palestine’ in the United Nations, including the use of the term ‘State of Palestine’ on the placard in the Security Council or the use of the term ‘State of Palestine’ in the invitation … do not reflect acquiescence that ‘Palestine’ is a state,” she said.

    The United States, Israel and seven other members of the 193-nation General Assembly voted against the Palestinian U.N. status upgrade in November.

    The White House on Wednesday renewed its call for a resumption of long-stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations in the wake of Israeli elections in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emerged the winner but with a weaker-than-expected showing for his right-wing bloc.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    10 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Boochie
    Boochie
    11 years ago

    is there anyone who can explain the pros and cons for the PLO to go to the ICC

    victorg
    victorg
    11 years ago

    The fact that Israel was granted their initial land by the previous owner and annexed the balance during an unprovoked declaration of war against them, what basis would anyone claim to have to challenge their right to build on that land? Just wondering

    11 years ago

    This is exactly what ISrael was warning. If the UN gives them rights, look what these animals are doing. When can we wipe them out once and for all?

    yaakov doe
    Member
    yaakov doe
    11 years ago

    Shouldn’t Israel go to that court everytime at there’s an attack by the so called “Palestinians”?

    11 years ago

    And here I thought that rockets flying into Israel killing it’s citizens and destroying homes and land was the deterrence to peace. Learn something new every day.

    Satmar
    Satmar
    11 years ago

    yes i am an IDF Soldier and i am located on Mt. Hermon

    11 years ago

    What does the Hague say about terrorism and missiles and suicide bombings?