New York City – If Bloomberg Can Do It, Why Not Bush-Cheney?

    19

    New York City – The tricks Mayor Michael Bloomberg pulled to get a third term, if applied nationally, might see President George W. Bush extending his stay in the White House for four more years.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    By declaring themselves indispensable in these troubled times, Bush and Dick Cheney, as Bloomberg, could possibly circumvent law as well as the will of the people. These twin pillars of democracy were all but collapsed in New York City Thursday. It doesn’t help that the Big Apple also spearheaded the collapse of the economies of world capitalism.

    Adding to the rubble, Mayor Bloomberg has trashed the law that dared limit his term to eight years. In 1993, and again in 1996, voters installed this protection against the abuse of incumbency power by greedy officials grown comfortable in office.

    Ensconced in his private East Side mansion, Bloomberg reportedly threw off signs of staying put in office months before the Wall Street collapse. Yet, he seized upon this economic crisis three weeks ago, linking his stewardship to the city’s recovery. New Yorkers might ponder why their financial wizard, once fired from Salomon Brothers, did not warn them about the meltdown and spare them the grief?

    Instead, the city’s economy teeters under Bloomberg’s watch – while his personal fortunes have skyrocketed. His name blazes atop a gleaming, glass skyscraper testifying to the “Bloomberg L.P.” empire expanded during his administration and run by his former deputy mayor, Daniel Doctoroff.

    Early in his term, Bloomberg, with a fortune estimated at $4.9 billion, was ranked 36th on Forbes’ 2003 list of billionaires. Growing steadily since, Hizzoner’s fortune, the magazine said, jumped to $11.5 billion in 2007 and placed him in the 25th slot. This year, he leaped to the eighth spot with a fortune Forbes estimated at some $20 billion.

    Rivals may quibble about a Bloomberg billion here or there, but being mayor for eight years has been very, very profitable for his personal wealth. The city has not done nearly as well, though it recovered from the economic chaos inherited from the Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who also was term-limited.

    When the terrorists struck the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, however, Mayor Giuliani attempted to extend his final term, declaring himself indispensable to the City on matters of public safety. As a GOP candidate, Bloomberg argued against the sitting mayor overriding term limits, thank you very much. New York has survived the self-declared Great One on security matters and would likely thrive again without the self-declared Great One on financial matters.

    These questions remain: (a) Would Bloomberg have pushed to extend his term had his personal fortune shrunk by 90 percent instead of expanded 400 percent? (b) What about national office? (c) Has the mayor simply run out of other political options acceptable to him?

    Last year, observers buzzed that Bloomberg was gearing up to run for U.S. president. He dropped the requisite weight, slammed partisan gridlock in Washington, and even discarded party affiliation to become an independent. Insiders floated that Hizzoner would run for president if Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton got the Democratic nomination. Her decline reportedly stayed his hand, though he kept the weight off for a vice-presidential nomination that never came.

    The next logical step for a city mayor who doesn’t have $20 billion might be governor. However, with Giuliani circling toward an Albany race, winters up North likely have chilled all gubernatorial ambitions. Besides, the political tycoon is snug in his mansion blocks away from his gleaming “Bloomberg” skyscraper.

    Why inconvenience such a popular lord of the manor with the trifle of term limits? Some 82 percent of New Yorkers want voters to decide on such an extension – not the mayor and City Council members who all stand to benefit. Yet, last week, Mayor Bloomberg and the rubber-stamp council passed a law-changing bill that would allow city officials to serve three terms. Opponents promise a court battle and final approval must be granted by the U.S. Justice Department.

    Herein lies an opportunity for Bush and Cheney, who, like Mayor Bloomberg, appear to have run out of political options. As the mayor tramples the law and the will of the people, what’s to keep Bush-Cheney from doing likewise? There’s plenty of time before Nov. 4. Stay tuned.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    19 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    FINANCIER
    FINANCIER
    15 years ago

    Just what we need 4 more years of rising deficits, the Dow decimated and rising unemployment. Unless the re-elected Bush Chaney team gets a loan from Bloomberg. They can make that Alaskan women ambassasor to Russia since she can lookout her window and see Russia, and McCain can lead the war effort.

    Chaim
    Chaim
    15 years ago

    You have more chances of growing a green beard then these 2 winning again.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    15 years ago

    because they don’t have a chance of getting reelcted

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    15 years ago

    Hey, where Rudolph Guliani? He would do good against Bloomberg.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    15 years ago

    This is one of the dumbest posts I’ve seen in a while. The US constitution can not be changed by a simple vote by the government, like the term limits law in NYC can be changed.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    15 years ago

    Money is the BEST protektzia

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    15 years ago

    Bloomberg did not ensconce himself as Mayor by extending the term limits. All he did was allow himself to run and serve again. If the people of NYC elect him again, then it seems that the will of the people has spoken. If the people of NYC are angry at Bloomberg for this, they won’t reelect him. Maybe all Bllomberg’s detractors should understand this concept.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    15 years ago

    Term limits are anti-democratic. If the majority of voters want to vote someone in for a third term, why not let them?

    Milhouse
    Milhouse
    15 years ago

    Sure Bush and Cheney can get a third term. All they have to do is convince two thirds of each house of Congress, plus the legislatures of 38 states, to repeal the 22nd amendment before the Electoral College meets on 15-Dec. Then they can appeal to the Electors to vote for them. That’s not likely to happen, but it could be done.

    AuthenticSatmar
    AuthenticSatmar
    15 years ago

    The president can declare a national emergency and suspend the constitution. He is granted that right in the constitution. If Obama wins, I believe that constitutes a national emergency.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    15 years ago

    cant be that the president could suspend the constitution. If this is true than the american people are crazy for electing hussein obama, ratavats. i still thik mccain will make it,or if not he will lose by one state and low margin. still dont understand halif of the american people.