Washington – President Donald Trump on Wednesday slammed the court that is deliberating his immigration and refugee executive order for having motivations he described as “so political.”
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
Speaking to a group of police chiefs and sheriffs, Trump said his immigration order was “done for the security of our nation.” He quoted from the portion of the immigration law that he said gave him the power to enact the ban, calling it “beautifully written” and saying even “a bad high school student would understand this.”
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is weighing the appeal of Trump’s executive order on immigration, which temporarily suspends the country’s refugee program and bans travel for citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries. In a hearing Tuesday, judges on the appeals court challenged the administration’s claim that the ban was motivated by terrorism fears, but also questioned an attorney’s argument that it unconstitutionally targeted Muslims.
Trump said he was watching the proceedings on television. He noted that there had not been a decision yet, but said that “courts seem to be so political.” He added that it “would be so great for our justice system if they could just read a statement and do what’s right. And that has to do with the security of our nation which is so important.”
Trump also repeated his promises to reduce violence in Chicago, saying that “no one in America should be punished” because of their birthplace. He pledged to provide resources to police departments and promised “zero tolerance” for violence against law enforcement.
Trump also promised to work on combating drug abuse and said there should be resources to deal with a “mental health crisis.”
Hundreds of members of the Major Cities Chiefs Association and Major County Sheriff’s Association were in the standing room crowd, some in uniform but the majority in plain clothes.
They snapped photos with their phones as the president spoke, but clapped sparingly when he asked whether they were in agreement with his views on the immigration ban. His comments about combatting drug abuse and the targeting of police officers drew a more unanimous response from the crowd.
He can “assert” all he wants, but if the Courts slap him down, as they seem ready to do in this case, than he can cry gevalt all he wants but they have the final say under the constitution. Even the most conservative judges have publicly called his comments about judges “bizarre” , “strange” and “totally inappropriate”. He seems to be purposely shooting himself in the foot so he can blame someone else for the fiasco this travel ban has become.
Can one of the VIN scholars please explain the following,
Why do non USA citzens have constitutional rights? Like why can’t we impose an outright muslim ban? Isn’t the constitution strictly for USA citizens only?
I have to agree with post #2 . How is one to understand 8 US code 1182. (f) :
> “Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline. “