Salem, OR – Oregon Set To Become 1st State With Mandatory Rent Controls

    3

    FILE - In this April 12, 2017 file photo, supporters of a bill to ban most no-cause evictions of home renters in Oregon demonstrate on the Capitol steps in Salem, Ore. A committee of the Oregon House of Representatives debated a bill that would make Oregon the first state to impose mandatory rent controls statewide. The committee on Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2019, rejected proposed amendments that would make certain parts of the state exempt from the bill. (AP Photo/Andrew Selsky, File)Salem, OR – Faced with a housing shortage and skyrocketing rents, Oregon is poised to become the first state to impose mandatory rent controls, with a measure establishing tenant protections moving swiftly through the Legislature.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Many residents have testified in favor of the legislation, describing anxiety and hardship as they face higher rents. Some have gone up by as much as almost 100 percent — forcing people to move, stay with friends or even live in their vehicles.

    The town of Medford recently authorized churches to offer car camping for the homeless on their parking lots. Cities across the West Coast are struggling with soaring housing prices and a growing homelessness problem.

    A House committee on Wednesday backed the measure, sending it to the full chamber for a vote as soon as next week. The Senate passed it last week.

    “I look forward to signing the bill,” Gov. Kate Brown, a Democrat, told reporters.

    The committee rejected an amendment that would have exempted cities with populations under 150,000 and another that would have delayed the measure from becoming law until Jan. 1, 2020, instead of immediately after Brown signs it.

    “We’ve waited too long as it is, and there are too many people living in tents. It is an emergency,” said Rep. Tawna Sanchez, a Portland Democrat and member of the House Committee on Human Services and Housing that endorsed the legislation.

    Oregon’s housing shortage is getting worse as people keep moving to the state, lured by its forests, mountains, coastline, relaxed lifestyle and job opportunities. Oregon ranked second to Vermont as the top moving destination in 2018, according to a study by United Van Lines, the largest U.S. household goods mover.

    Lawmakers noted Oregon will be a pioneer in statewide rent control if the measure becomes law. New York has a statewide rent control law but cities can choose whether to participate.

    California restricts the ability of cities to impose rent control. Last November, voters defeated a ballot initiative that would have overturned that law.

    “Homelessness and affordability have no boundaries,” said Rep. Mark Meek, a Democrat from a Portland suburb. “We’re going to be leading the nation now with this legislation.”

    Oregon’s measure prohibits landlords from terminating month-to-month leases without cause after 12 months of occupancy and limits rent hikes to once per year. Those increases are limited to 7 percent above the annual change in the consumer price index.
    In this photo taken Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2019, a committee of the Oregon House of Representatives debates a bill in Salem, Ore., that would make Oregon the first state to impose mandatory rent controls statewide. The committee on Wednesday rejected proposed amendments that would make certain parts of the state exempt from the bill. The bill sailed through the Senate and Gov. Kate Brown expects the pioneering legislation to reach her desk for her to sign. (AP Photo/Andrew Selsky)
    Landlords can terminate tenancies only with 90 days’ written notice and payment of one month’s rent, with exemptions in some cases. A landlord can refuse to renew a fixed-term lease if the tenant receives three lease violation warnings within 12 months and the landlord gives 90 days’ notice.

    The Oregon Rental Housing Association representing small-scale landlords said the measure protects good tenants while not encouraging landlords to leave the business and invest their money elsewhere.

    “I believe most landlords will be able to adapt and operate within the parameters,” said Jim Straub, the group’s legislative director.

    Eric Lint, who lives in the popular mountain town of Bend, urged lawmakers to pass the protections because of skyrocketing rents. The medical lab where he works is chronically understaffed because potential hires say there is a lack of affordable housing.

    Lint said his hourly pay has risen 8 percent over five years. Meanwhile, his rent has increased 66 percent. He plans to move away in the fall but did not say where in his testimony.

    Anna Pena, a senior at the University of Oregon in Eugene who works full time, described living in a house smaller than 1,200 square feet (111 square meters) with five roommates and spending over half her income on rent that then increased by 15 percent.

    “Ultimately, housing insecurity has been one of the biggest setbacks for my education and personal health,” she said.

    Sen. Tim Knopp, a Republican from Bend, said before he voted against the measure last week that it does not address the housing supply issue.

    Another measure aiming to deal with that issue would require cities and counties to allow duplexes and some higher-density housing in lands zoned for single-family homes.

    House Speaker Tina Kotek, a Democrat, said 30,000 housing units must be built per year to meet the state’s current housing deficit and to build for the future as more people move to Oregon.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    3 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    5 years ago

    I live in a 650 sq ft apt with my family of 5 and I pay more than 65 percent of my income to rent. People around here would be thrilled to have a 1200 sq ft house.

    PaulinSaudi
    PaulinSaudi
    5 years ago

    Life seems very unfair to you, #1 . Perhaps you ought to move to Oregon.

    grandbear
    grandbear
    5 years ago

    When there was rent control in NYC there were vacant apartments available . It could take time ,but there were vacancies Today no rent control and skyrocketing prices of both rental and co op apts have made living in NYC almost impossible. Wages aren’t increasing as much as the price of housing , for years now.At one time in the past the cost of housing was one weeks salary today its may be 2 weeks or more, leaving little left for all of the rest of the bills. In the past the investors in real estate expected to make %3 from his investment or a little more today the sky’s the limit.and foreign investors look to have their money in a safe place, namely new york real estate.