New York – NY Times to Charge for Frequent Access to Its Web Site

    5

    New York – The New York Times announced Wednesday that it intended to charge frequent readers for access to its Web site, a step being debated across the industry that nearly every major newspaper has so far feared to take.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Starting in early 2011, visitors to NYTimes.com will get a certain number of articles free every month before being asked to pay a flat fee for unlimited access. Subscribers to the newspaper’s print edition will receive full access to the site.

    But executives of The New York Times Company said they could not yet answer fundamental questions about the plan, like how much it would cost or what the limit would be on free reading. They stressed that the amount of free access could change with time, in response to economic conditions and reader demand.

    “This announcement allows us to begin the thought process that’s going to answer so many of the questions that we all care about,” Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the company chairman and publisher of the newspaper, said in an interview. “We can’t get this halfway right or three-quarters of the way right. We have to get this really, really right.”

    Any changes are sure to be closely watched by publishers and other purveyors of online content who scoffed at the notion of online charging until advertising began to plummet in 2007, battering visions of Internet businesses supported solely by ads. Few general-interest publications charge now, but many newspapers and magazines are studying whether to make the switch.

    Still, publishers fear that income from digital subscriptions would not compensate for the resulting loss of audience and advertising revenue.

    NYTimes.com is by far the most popular newspaper site in the country, with more than 17 million readers a month in the United States, according to Nielsen Online, and analysts say it is easily the leader in advertising revenue, as well. That may make it better positioned than other general-interest papers to charge — and also gives The Times more to lose if the move backfires.

    Read more at The NY Times


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    5 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    BIG mistake, nytimes.com.

    I’ll go elsewhere. Just watch.

    RJ
    RJ
    14 years ago

    You’re going elsewhere? Which competing website provides similar material?

    WSJ.com has been successfully charging for its website for years. People will pay for content that’s impossible to find elsewhere.

    Shmuel
    Shmuel
    14 years ago

    Great move!

    While fewer and fewer readers want to read that wretched rug even for free, they decided to charge for it?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    I think the NYTimes will back off. A few years ago they started charging for access to opinion articles (“Times Select”). That didn’t last very long. And there actually are other good news sites – the BBC, the Washington Post, and so forth.

    And if you really can’t live without the NYTimes, you can always read the print version in the (gasp!) library – for absolutely free.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    Good, less people will read the anti-Israel garbage spewed from that rag.